Page 4 - CUA 2020_Functional Urology
P. 4

2020 CUA Abstracts





        The only special interest TEAE reported by ≥1% of patients was urinary   POD-3.6. Table 1. Baseline preoperative parameters
        retention; two (0.6%) TAM+MIRA patients required catheterization (nei-
        ther required discontinuation). No major changes in mean blood pressure   between two main cohorts (St1 50-75%, St1 >75%)
        or pulse rate were noted and similar ECG parameters were observed for         St1 50–75%  St1 >75%  p
        both groups (Fig. 1). Changes in mean PVR volume and Q max  were not   Patients (n)  76     61
        clinically meaningful.
        Conclusions: No unexpected safety concerns were observed in men   Age (mean, yrs)  50.7     50     0.96
        receiving treatment with TAM for LUTS due to BPH who subsequently   Sex (n=#female, %)  68 (89.5%)  53 (86.9%)  0.64
        received add-on MIRA or PL.                            OAB category (n=wet, %)  60 (78.9%)  50 (82%)  0.95
                                                               Neuropathy present      21 (27.6%)  7 (11.9%)  0.025
        POD-3.6                                                SUI (i.e., MUI; n=#pts)   31 (40.8%)  39 (63.9%)  0.007
        Is the 50% improvement threshold adequate for progression to
        implantation in sacral neuromodulation?                Diabetes present        17 (22.4%)  16 (26.2%)  0.59
        David K. Charles , Ross G. Everett , Zachary J. Prebay , Truman P.   CAD present  4 (5.3%)  1 (1.6%)  0.38
                     1
                                  1
                                                 1
        Landowski , R. Corey O’Connor , Michael L. Guralnick 1  HTN present            26 (34.2%)  21 (34.4%)  0.98
                              1
               1
        1 Urologic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United
        States                                                 Neurogenic bladder      10 (13.3%)  7 (11.7%)  0.77
        Introduction: A >50% subjective improvement in urinary symptoms dur-  Hx back surgery  14 (18.4%)  9 (15%)  0.59
        ing sacral nerve stimulation testing (St1) is currently used as indication for   Hx trauma  8 (10.5%)  8 (13.3%)  0.61
        progression to stage two implantation (St2). While approximately 66–90%
        of patients will have successful St1 and proceed to St2, some deteriora-  Multiple sclerosis  1 (1.3%)  4 (6.7%)  0.17
        tion in efficacy over time has been reported. It is unclear if this is related   Stroke  2 (2.6%)  3 (5.0%)  0.65
        to the initial degree of improvement. We sought to determine if >50%   Parkinson’s  2 (2.6%)  1 (1.7%)  1.0
        improvement after St1 is sufficient to predict long-term success.
        Methods: The records of 213 patients who underwent sacral neuromod-  AUASS total (mean ± SD)  22.4±8.0  20.7±8.2  0.56
        ulation (SNM) for overactive bladder (OAB) were reviewed. Subjects   UDI6 total (mean ± SD)  13.9±6.2  14.3±6.0  0.89
        were divided into those who reported 50–75% improvement and >75%   Average void (oz, mean ± SD)  5.6±3.1  6.3±3.9  0.49
        improvement after St1 who went on to St2. Differences in clinical vari-
        ables, including patient-reported outcome measures, diary and pad test   Maximum void (oz, mean ±   11.5±5.8    12.1±6.6   0.97
        information, and urodynamic characteristics, were compared between   SD)
        groups. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess for   Urinary frequency (#/24h,   12.7±5.5    12.7±5.6    0.73
        associations between these variables, reported improvement after St1,   mean ± SD)
        and long-term success with SNM after St2.
        Results: Of 213 OAB patients who underwent St1, 76 (35.7%) reported   UUI episodes (#/24h, mean   3.6±3.1    4.5±3.4   0.31
        50–75% improvement and 70 (92.1%) of those progressed to St2 (group   ± SD)
        1), whereas 61 patients (28.6%) reported >75% and 57 (93.4%) of those   Pad test (#pads/24h, mean ±   4.1±3.1   3.5±1.7  0.82
        progressed to St2 (group 2). The remaining initial 76 patients reported   SD)
        <50% during St1 and were excluded. Baseline characteristics (comor-  Pad test (pad wt (g/24h, mean  442.1±490.4 432.1±469.6  0.93
        bidities, symptom scores, bladder diaries, pad usage, and urodynamic
        parameters) were not significantly different between groups except that   ± SD)
        neuropathy was more prevalent in group 1 and SUI in group 2. After   Maximum systometric   328.8±234.7 321.4±232.1 0.813
        St1, improvements in symptom scores and diary/pad usage were not   capacity (oz, mean ± SD)
        significantly different between groups apart from a greater improvement   Detrusor overactivity present  32 (43.8%)  30 (53.6%)  0.27
        in AUASS bother score in group 2 (3.43 [n= 7] vs. 1.6 [n=5], p=0.04).
        After St2, group 2 patients were more likely to report a >75% improve-  Patients progressed to St2   70 (92.1%)  57 (93.4%)  0.482
        ment (71.2% vs. 34.2%, p<0.01). With a mean followup of 46 months,   (n=# pts)
        44.3% of group 1 patients and 68.4% of group 2 patients still had a
        functioning device providing symptomatic benefit (p=0.007). This was
        confirmed on logistic regression with the only variable that significantly
        predicted long-term functional success being the degree of improvement   POD-3.6. Table 2. Long-term followup SNM information
        during St1 (50–75% vs. >75% improvement, odds ratio 0.367, p=0.0072).        St1 50–75%  St1 >75%  p
        Furthermore, the group 2 patients had improved censored device surviv-  Mean followup time   45.8  46.2  0.96
        ability on Kaplan-Meier curve (hazard ratio 1.757, p= 0.037).
        Conclusions: We found no significant differences in the majority of base-  (months)
        line characteristics and clinical data between patients with a 50–75%   Continued SNM-related   31 (44.3%)  39 (68.4%)  0.007
        improvement and those with >75% improvement after St1. However,   improvement (n=#pts, %)
        with longer-term followup, patients who achieved a >75% improvement   Initiated alternative therapy   17 (24.3%)  7 (12.3%)  0.002
        during St1 were more likely to maintain device efficacy. Additional study   (i.e., SNM failure, n=#pts, %)
        is warranted to determine if a higher threshold of improvement during
        St1 should be considered before proceeding to St2.     Device explanted (n=#pts, %)  22 (31.4%)  11 (19.3%)  0.34











        S36                                     CUAJ • June 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 6(Suppl2)
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9