Page 2 - CUA 2020_Onco_Testis-Kidney-Urothelial
P. 2

2020 CUA Abstracts





        POD-4.2                                              to have UTUC. RCC prevalence was 0.98% (n=107). Similarly, RCC was
        Diagnostic test performance of ultrasound and cytology in upper   more prevalent in VH (1.26%, n=90) vs. NVH (0.41%, n=13) and NH
        tract cancer: Results from a global, multicenter analysis  (0.65%, n=4). Ultrasound (USS) performed better in detecting RCC in
                              1,2
                                          1,2
                                                      3
                 1,2
        Taeweon Lee , Miles Mannas , Peter C. Black , Mark Assmus , Tim   the NVH group than in the VH group (Table 1). USS was poor at detect-
                                                    6
             3
                         4
                                     5
        Wollin , Sinan Khadhouri , Kevin Gallagher , Kenneth MacKenzie , Taimur   ing UTUC alone, however, improved in sensitivity when combined with
                                   9
                                                     10
                        8
            7
        Shah , Chuanyu Gao , Sacha Moore , Eleanor Zimmermann , Eric   cytology. All UTUCs in the NVH group without bladder cancer were
                                       6
        Edison , Matthew Jefferies , Arjun Nambiar , Matthew Nielsen , John   detected using a combination of USS, cytology, and flexible cystoscopy.
                                                     13
             11
                           12
              14
        McGrath , Veeru Kasivisvananthan 15                  Conclusions: UTUC and RCC are rare. USS is a good diagnostic per-
        1 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia,   formance test in detecting RCC, especially in patients with NVH.
        Vancouver, BC, Canada;  Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver General   Combined non-invasive tests improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting
                         2
                                 3
        Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada;  Division of Urology, University of   UTUC. These can be considered in place of CTU in selected patients
                              4
        Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;  Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal   in a risk-stratified model.
        Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom;  Department of Urology, Western
                                   5
                                         6
        General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;  Department of Urology,   POD-4.3
        Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, United Kingdom;  Department of Surgery and   The prognostic and predictive implications of the 12-Chemokine
                                        7
                                                 8
        Cancer, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom;  Department   Score in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
        of  Urology,  Peterborough  City  Hospital,  Peterborough,  United   Logan Zemp , Anders Berglund , Jasreman Dhillon , RyanPutney ,
                                                                                                              2
                                                                                     2*
                                                                      1*
                                                                                                    3
        Kingdom;  Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham,   Youngchul Kim , Rohit K. Jain , G. Daniel Grass , Jingsong Zhang , Mic
               9
                                                                                                           1
                                                                                               4
                                                                                  1
                                                                        2
                     10
        United Kingdom;  Department of Urology, Weston General Hospital,   hael A. Poch , Julio Pow-Sang , Wade J. Sexton , Scott M. Gilbert , Shari
                                                                                             1
                                                                                                          1
                                                                                  1
                                                                      1
        Weston-super-Mare, United Kingdom;  Department of Urology, North   Pilon-Thomas , José Conejo-Garcia , Colin P.N. Dinney , James J. Mulé ,
                                   11
                                                                       5
                                                                                     5
                                                                                                   6
                                                                                                              5
        Middlesex Hospital, London, United Kingdom;  Department of Urology,   Roger Li, MD
                                        12
                                                                      1,5
                                           13
        Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom;  University of North   1 Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer
        Carolina, Dept. of Urology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States;   Center, Tampa, FL, United States; Department of Biostatistics and
                                                                                       2
        14 Department of Urology, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter,   Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States;
        United Kingdom;  Department of Urology, University College London,   3 Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,
                     15
        London, United Kingdom; The IDENTIFY Study Group     United States;  Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer
                                                                       4
        Introduction: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and renal cell   Center, Tampa, FL, United States;  Department of Immunology, H. Lee
                                                                                     5
        carcinoma (RCC) are rare in patients with hematuria. There is limited data   Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States;  Department of Urology,
                                                                                              6
        to guide the most appropriate upper tract evaluation in these patients. We   MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
        evaluated the diagnostic test performance of investigations for UTUC and   *Contributed equally to the study
        RCC in a global study of patients referred to secondary care for suspected   Introduction: Adaptive anti-tumor immunity can be orchestrated by lymph
        urinary tract cancer.                                node-like immune cell aggregates within the tumor microenvironment
        Methods: The IDENTIFY group prospectively assessed 10 896 patients (27   (TME) called tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). TLSs are postulated to
        countries). Those with previous urological malignancy were excluded.   be the gateway of lymphocyte infiltration into the TME. A 12-chemokine
        Diagnostic test performance (e.g., cystoscopy, imaging) was assessed   (12-CK) metagene grouping (has previously been described that corre-
        using the predetermined reference standard (i.e., detection of UTUC/  lates with the presence of TLSs in other solid tumor types and response
        RCC with histology or accepted clinical gold standard diagnosis) with   to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In this study, we explored the
        resultant index test outcomes. Computed tomography urography (CTU)   prognostic implication of the 12-CK score in bladder cancer and its cor-
        was considered the reference test, thus its performance was not observed.   relation with the presence of TLSs.
        Equivocal outcomes were deemed positive findings, as these prompted   Methods: Cystectomy specimens from 130 patients with bladder cancer
        further workup. Test adequacy was determined by individual collaborators   were arrayed on Affymetrix microarrays. 12-CK scores were normalized
        and only those deemed adequate were included in the analysis.  with >1 denoting high scores (12-CKHi). Overall survival was estimated
        Results: UTUC prevalence was 1.17% (n=128). It was more prevalent   using the Kaplan-Meier method. Findings were validated using 12-CK
        in patients with visible hematuria (VH) (1.60%, n=114) vs. non-visible   scores extracted from TCGA data. Immunohistochemistry antibody stain-
        hematuria (NVH) (0.29%, n=9) and no hematuria (NH) (0.81%, n=5).   ing was performed for CD4, CD8, CD20, LAMP3. A genitourinary (GU)
        Among those with NVH under the age of 60 (n=1313), no one was found   pathologist scored TLSs into types I-III, with type III representing fully
         POD-4.2. Table 1. The diagnostic test evaluation of ultrasound (USS) and cytology in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and upper
         tract urothelial cancer (UTUC)
                                         n      Sensitivity  Specificity  Positive predictive value  Negative predictive value
         Renal cell carcinoma
         USS                 Overall   6913       81.6%       98.0%           22.6%                99.9%
                             In VH     4165       82.1%       97.8%           26.0%                99.8%
                             In NVH    2380       87.5%       98.3%           14.6%                100%
         Upper tract urothelial cancer
         USS                            **        50.0%       97.9%           16.9%                99.6%
         Cytology                       **        58.8%       89.4%            8.4%                99.2%
         USS + cytology                5798       78.7%       92.3%            9.8%                99.8%
         USS + cytology +    Overall    **        80.0%       92.1%           10.3%                99.8%
         cystoscopy*         in VH     3265       79.2%       91.2%           13.0%                99.6%
                             in NVH    2282       100%        94.2%            3.7%                100%
         *Cystoscopy findings suspicious for tumour (e.g., hematuric jet from ureteric orifice, bulge in the transmural ureter). **Final data pending distribution from the IDENTIFY study group.
        S38                                     CUAJ • June 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 6(Suppl2)
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7