Page 10 - CUA 2020_Technology and Training_v2
P. 10

2020 CUA Abstracts








              50                                          100
                                              Roll                                                    Roll
                                              Pitch                                                   Pitch
                                              Yaw          50                                         Yaw
               0
                                                           0
             Degrees  –50                                Degrees  –50

             –100                                        –100
                                                         –150
             –150
                                                         –200
             –200                                        –250
                0    20   40    60    80   100   120         0       50       100      150      200       250
                              Seconds                                                 Seconds
        MP-6.2. Fig. 1. Scope rotation for (A) expert run; and (B) novice run.
        MP-6.3                                               MP-6.4
        Evaluating the utility of a novel 3D immersive virtual-reality   Development, implementation, and evaluation of a point of care
        percutaneous nephrolithotomy simulator               ultrasound course for training urology residents
        Jason Y. Lee , Luke Reynolds , Monica Farcas 1       Catherine Anne Lovatt , Michael John Uy , Jennifer Hoogenes , Carol
                           1
                                                                             1
                                                                                           1
                                                                                                          1
                1
                                                                   2
        1 Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada  Bernacci , Edward D. Matsumoto 1
        Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard   1 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University,
        treatment for patients with a large stone burden. Gaining safe access into   Hamilton, ON, Canada;  Department of Medical Radiation Sciences,
                                                                               2
        the collecting system is the most critical step of PCNL, but also the most   Mohawk College, Hamilton, ON, Canada
        technically challenging aspect. There are a variety of methods to teach   Support: Mohawk College Department of Radiation Sciences
        this important endourological skill, including the use of simulation-based   Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a widely used bedside
        methods. In this study, we evaluate three PCNL simulation platforms,   tool in urology. Applications include the assessment of an undifferenti-
        including a novel, 3D-immersive VR simulator, for potential use in teach-  ated acute scrotum, renal colic, and the guidance of suprapubic catheter
        ing and assessing PCNL access skills.                placement. However, the user-dependent nature of this modality neces-
        Methods: Urology residents, fellows, and faculty from our institution were   sitates appropriate use and competence. The objective of this study was to
        recruited to participate in this study, which included completing standard-  develop and evaluate an introductory PoCUS course for urology residents.
        ized tasks on three PCNL simulation platforms: the Marion K181 simula-  Methods: All urology residents at our institution completed a three-hour,
        tor (Marion Surgical), the PercMentor VR simulator (Symbionix), and a   online course followed by a three-hour, hands-on seminar involving kid-
        porcine inanimate PCNL model (Cook Medical). All participants were   ney, bladder, and testicular sonographic scanning. Simulated testicular
        given standardized introductions to each of the three simulated platforms   phantoms (Fig. 1) and suprapubic catheter models (Fig. 2) were con-
        before being asked to complete the standardized tasks — gaining PCNL   structed and used in an ultrasound lab. Course material was developed
        access using a fluoroscopic-guided technique. Participant demographic   by licensed ultrasound technologists, based on the Sonography Canada
        and performance data were recorded for analysis. Participants also evalu-  National Competency Profiles.  Pre- and post-course surveys focused on
                                                                                  1
        ated the three PCNL simulation platforms.            residents’ user confidence, while pre- and post-course multiple-choice
        Results: A total of 18 participants (two faculty endourologists, four endou-  questionnaires (MCQ) assessed theoretical knowledge.
        rology fellows, 12 urology residents) with varying levels of PCNL experi-  Results: Fourteen urology residents (PGY 1–5) participated in the course.
        ence (78% had performed <10 cases, 17% over 50 cases) completed the   Theoretical knowledge in PoCUS improved significantly (p<0.001), as
        study. The Marion K181 had higher ratings in all domains compared to the
        Perc Mentor (p<0.05) but did not differ in any domain when compared
        to the Cook porcine PCNL model. Fluoroscopy time was the variable
        that most consistently correlated with participant PCNL experience and
        level of training across all three PCNL simulation platforms, but other
        performance metrics did not correlate well.
        Conclusions: There are a variety of PCNL simulation platforms available
        for teaching PCNL access skills. Based on our initial study, there is validity
        evidence to support the use of the novel Marion K181 PCNL simulator
        as a teaching tool, with high user ratings across domains, but evidence
        is yet lacking for use as an assessment tool.
                                                             MP-6.4. Fig. 1. Simulated testicular phantoms within the scrotal case (left)
                                                             and corresponding sonographic appearance (right).





        S110                                    CUAJ • June 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 6(Suppl2)
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14