Page 6 - CUAJ February 2019: Clean intermittent catheterization: Single use vs. reuse

CIC: Single use vs. reuse

19. Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu CD, et al. Randomized crossover trial of single use hydrophilic coated vs. 31. Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterization: Cost-
multiple use polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization to determine incidence of urinary effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses. BMJ Open 2017;7:e012360.
infection. J Urol 2015;194:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.096 32. Clark JF, Mealing SJ, Scott DA, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term intermittent catheterization
20. Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: with hydrophilic and uncoated catheters. Spinal Cord 2016;54:73-7.
Systematic literature review and meta-analyses. BMC Urol 2017;17:4. 33. Neovius K, Hakansson M, Lundqvist T. Cost consequences of single-use and reuse of urinary catheters
21. Defoor W, Reddy P, Reed M, et al. Results of a prospective, randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic among patients performing daily intermittent catheterization. Value Health 2015;18:A351-2. https://
to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder. J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:373e1-e5. doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.644
22. Bogaert GA, Goeman L, De Ridder D, et al. The physical and antimicrobial effects of microwave heat- 34. Hill TC, Baverstock R, Carlson KV, et al. Best practices for the treatment and prevention of urinary tract
ing and alcohol immersion on catheters that are reused for clean intermittent catheterization. Eur Urol infection in the spinal cord injured population: The Alberta context. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7:122-30.
2004;46:641-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.06.016 https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.337
23. Chan JL, Cooney TE, Schober JM. Adequacy of sanitization and storage of catheters for intermittent 35. Bortel K, Hensley DL, Kliever EM, et al. Adult intermittent self-catheterization patient fact sheet. Available
use after washing and microwave sterilization. J Urol 2009;182:2085-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. at: https://www.suna.org/download/members/selfCatheterization.pdf. Accessed Feb. 3, 2018.
juro.2009.03.019 36. European Association of Urology Nurses. Evidence-based guidelines for best practice in urological health
24. Sherbondy AL, Cooper CS, Kalinowski SE, et al. Variability in catheter microwave sterilization techniques in care catheteriztion urethral intermittent in adults. Available at: http://patients.uroweb.org/wp-content/
a single clinic population. J Urol 2002;168:562-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200208000- uploads/ catheterization-Urethral-Intermittent-in-adults-Lr_DEF.pdf. Accessed Feb. 3, 2018.
00034 37. Canadian Urological Association. Clean intermittent self-catheterization for women. Available at:
25. Kovindha A, Mai WN, Madersbacher H. Reused silicone catheter for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC): https://www.cua.org/themes/web/assets/files/patient_info/secured/en/2e-self-catherization_s.
Is it safe for spinal cord-injured (SCI) men? Spinal Cord 2004;42:638-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/ pdf. Accessed Feb. 3, 2018.
sj.sc.3101646 38. Canadian Urological Association. Clean intermittent self-catheterization for men. Available at:
26. Shamout S, Biardeau X, Corcos J, et al. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-inter - https://www.cua.org/themes/web/assets/files/pibw_1e-self-catherization_men.pdf. Accessed Feb.
mittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: A systematic review. Spinal Cord 2017;55:629-43. 3, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.192
27. Welk B, Isaranuwatchai W, Krassioukov A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated intermittent Correspondence: Dr. Dean S. Elterman, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University
catheters compared with uncoated catheters in Canada: A public payer perspective. J Med Econ [serial on Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; dean.elterman@uhn.ca
the internet]. 2018 March:[1-10.]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458282.
Accessed March 31, 2018.
28. Pinder B, Lloyd AJ, Nafees B, et al. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent
self-catheters. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015;9:381-8. To answer the multiple-choice questions associated with this article, go to: www.cuasection3cred-
29. Watanabe T, Yamamoto S, Gotoh M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term intermittent self- its.org/cuajfebruary2019. This program is an Accredited Self-Assessment Program (Section 3)
catheterization with hydrophilic-coated and uncoated catheters in patients with spinal cord injury in Japan. as defined by the Maintenance of Certification Program of The Royal College of Physicians &
Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2017;9:142-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12122 Surgeons of Canada, and approved by the Canadian Urological Association. Remember to visit
30. Truzzi JC, Teich V, Pepe C. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in MAINPORT (www.mainport.org/mainport/) to record your learning and outcomes. You may
Brazil? A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries. Int Braz J Urol 2018;44:121-31. claim a maximum of 1 hour of credit.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0221

CUAJ • February 2019 • Volume 13, Issue 2 69