Page 4 - CUA2018 Abstracts - Miscellaneous/Other
P. 4

2018 CUA AbstrACts







       Poster Session 2: Education/Practice Management

       June 25, 2018; 0800–0930









       MP–2.1                                                Methods: Six first–year residents from two Canadian centres participated
       Development and validation of a 3D–printed bladder model to   in the two–day boot camp, which included 11 didactic lectures (first–
       simulate the laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis for radical   year medical and surgical topics) and simulation sessions that allowed for
       prostatectomy training                                deliberate practice with feedback. Participants completed an entrance and
                         1
                                    1
                                            1
       Yanbo Guo , Jen Hoogenes , Nathan Wong , Kevin Kim , Bobby Shayegan ,   exit survey and an identical pre– and post–boot camp 31–item multiple–
                                                         1
               1
       Edward Matsumoto 1                                    choice questionnaire (MCQ). At the end of Day 2, participants completed
       1 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University,   a six–station objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) followed by a semi–
       Hamilton, ON, Canada                                  structured group feedback discussion. Three second–year urology residents
       Introduction: The laparoscopic approach of performing a radical prostatec-  served as historical controls and completed the identical MCQ and OSCE.
       tomy (RP) is associated with a steep learning curve, especially during the   Results: The six participants had a mean age of 26.8±2 years, three were
       urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA). In an attempt to decrease the learning   male, and represented five medical schools. Most prior urology experience
       curve for performing a UVA, we developed a 3D printed bladder model for   was as an observer or second assist. Participants markedly improved on the
       simulated UVA training. Our objective was to validate this model.  pre– and post– MCQs (62%±11 and 91%±9, respectively), whereas the his-
                                                    ®
       Methods: The final bladder model was produced using a LulzBot  TAZ 6   torical controls scored 66%±8. Participants scored marginally higher than
       3D printer. The dimensions mimic the anatomical structures of a human   the controls on four of the six OSCE stations. Post–boot camp, participants
       bladder and urethra, and the polymer allows for realistic incising and suture   reported overall higher confidence levels and felt the curriculum was an
       pull–through. Urology residents, fellows, and staff completed a laparoscopic   excellent preparation for residency.
       training course during which they performed a simulated UVA on the   Conclusions: Our inaugural urology boot camp demonstrated feasibility and
       model. Laparoscopic video trainers were used with the model affixed inside   utility. The knowledge and technical skills uptake was established via the
       a simulated torso (Fig. 1; available at https://cua.guide/), and each UVA   MCQ and OSCE results, with participants’ performance at or even above the
       was videotaped for construct validation purposes. Participants completed   level of the second–year resident controls. We aim to further develop our
       an exit questionnaire using five–point Likert scales within six domains.  boot camp and provide a framework for other urology residency programs.
       Results: Junior and senior residents, fellows, and staff from seven urology
       programs completed the course (n=24). Mean age was 29.8 years (±4.6),   MP–2.3
       and 21 were male. For face validity, participants scored the following means   The difficulty of a clinical OSCE start station does not impact
       (out of 5): 3.6 for anatomical realism; 3.8 for overall task–based usefulness;   final OSCE mark
       4.1 for the UVA task itself; and 4.4 for suturing, knot tying, and cutting. For   Avril Lusty , Naji Touma , Michael Leveridge 1
                                                                    1
                                                                              1
       content validity, participants rated overall usefulness as a training tool 4.3   1 Department of Urology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
       and improving operative technique 4.4. Overall reaction scored a mean   Introduction: Examinees in clinical objective structured clinical examina-
       of 4.2 over the six domains. A mean of 4.1 was scored for transferability   tions (OSCEs) may be concerned that the difficulty (or ease) of their start
       of skills to the operating room, and a mean of 4.3 was indicated for “the   station may undermine (or bolster) their confidence and subsequent per-
       model should be incorporated into urology training curricula.”  formance. We sought to determine if starting at the easiest or most difficult
       Conclusions: We established that this low–cost bladder model ($14 CAD/  station impacts overall outcome.
       model) has face and content validity for laparoscopic UVA training within   Methods: Results of all Canadian PGY–5 candidates writing the Queen’s
       this sample, and skills acquired using the model can prepare learners for   University Examination of Skills Training (QUEST) examination between
       live laparoscopic UVAs. The videos are currently being evaluated by three   2003 and 2013 were queried, and selected stations (the easiest, most diffi-
       expert raters to assess the model’s construct validity.  cult, and most difficult manned) were determined for each year. Independent
                                                             sample t–tests and regression analysis were used to determine if there was a
       MP–2.2                                                significant difference in final OSCE scores between participants who began
       Development, implementation, and evaluation of a competency–  on the selected stations vs. the participants who did not.
       based boot camp for first–year urology residents      Results: Three hundred twenty–six residents participated over the study
                     1
                               1
                                          1
       Yuding (Ding) Wang , Jen Hoogenes , Udi Blankstein , Kevin Kim , Roderick   period. Mean station score was 74.3% (standard deviation [SD] 6.0%).
                                                  1
                                   1
           2
       Clark , Ali Al–Hashimi , Bobby Shayegan , Edward Matsumoto 1  There was no significant difference noted in overall final OSCE scores
                      1
       1 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University,   between the participants who began on the easiest (73.7% vs. 74.6%;
       Hamilton, ON, Canada;  Department of Surgery, Division of Urology,   p=0.524), the most difficult (74.1% vs. 74.3%; p=0.868), or the most dif-
                         2
       Western University, London, ON, Canada                ficult manned (73.6% vs. 74.4%; p=0.459) stations and those participants
       Study Groups: McMaster University Surgical Associates.  who did not. On regression analysis, the easiest, most difficult, and most
       Introduction: The integration of competency–based education into surgical   difficult manned stations each resulted in non–significant decreases in mean
       residency programs, such as the Competence by Design (CBD) initiative in   score (–0.9%, –0.3%, and –1.4%, respectively).
       Canada, presents challenges for curricula design to ensure residents achieve   Conclusions: The difficulty level of the starting station on an OSCE examina-
       competence as they progress. Surgical boot camps have been used to   tion does not appear to benefit, nor harm subsequent overall performance
       improve the learning process by orienting and preparing new residents. We   on the examination.
       developed, implemented, and evaluated an intensive didactic and simula-
       tion–focused boot camp for first–year urology residents.
                                                  CUAJ • June 2018 • Volume 12(6Suppl2)                       S73
                                                  © 2018 Canadian Urological Association
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9