Page 5 - [Podium Sessions] CUA 2022 Annual Meeting Abstracts
P. 5

Podium 2: Endourology





        Patients discharged for conservative management of a ureteric stone had a   we began performing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and
        lower representation rate in the post-guideline group (12.6%) compared   laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) as outpatient surgeries. Recent
        with the pre-guideline group (17.2%), however, this did not reach statis-  literature has suggested that RARP and LEP are safe and feasible as same-
        tical significance (p=0.18).                         day surgeries. 3-6  Our goal was to determine if there was a difference in
        Conclusions: We recommend the implementation of local clinical prac-
        tice guidelines to streamline and standardize the assessment and man-
        agement of ureteric stones in the ED. There is significant benefit in both   POD-2.4. Table 1B. LEP patient characteristics
        patient and hospital outcomes, with decreased radiation exposure through   Planned same-  Planned   p
        a reduced number of CT scans, reduced ED length of stay, and reduced   day (n=46)   inpatient (n=30)
        representation rates.
                                                               Age
        POD-2.4                                                 Mean (SD)      70.4 (7.31)  69.3 (6.68)  0.488
        Performing urological inpatient procedures as same-day   Median [min, max] 70.5 [56.0, 84.0] 70.0 [55.0, 83.0]
        procedures during the COVID pandemic — a retrospective   ASA
        feasibility study                                       1              17 (37.0%)   11 (36.7%)   0.913
        Nicolas Siron , Anis Assad , Jean-Baptiste Lattouf , Kevin Zorn , Malek
                                                    1
                  1
                                           1
                           1
        Meskawi , Naeem Bhojani 1                               2              23 (50.0%)   16 (53.3%)
              1
        1 Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CHUM),   3  6 (13.0%)  3 (10.0%)
        Montreal, QC, Canada                                   RCRI
        Introduction: In line with provincial directives due to the COVID pan-
        demic, certain urological procedures that are normally performed as   0  39 (84.8%)  28 (93.3%)  0.127
        inpatient procedures were performed as same-day procedures to reduce   1  7 (15.2%)  1 (3.3%)
        the usage of healthcare resources.  At our center, during the pandemic,   2  0 (0%)  1 (3.3%)
                               1,2
                                                               Anesthesia
         POD-2.4. Table 1A. RARP patient characteristics        General        5 (10.9%)    1 (3.3%)     0.45
                          Planned      Planned same-  p         Regional       41 (89.1%)   29 (96.7%)
                          inpatient (n=95) day (n=43)          Anticoagulated
         Surgery                                                No             33 (71.7%)   30 (100%)    0.00601
           RARP           92 (96.8%)   42 (97.7%)   1           Antiplatelet   12 (26.1%)   0 (0%)
           RARPLND        3 (3.2%)     1 (2.3%)                 Anticoagulated  1 (2.2%)    0 (0%)
         Prostate volume                                       Prostate volume
           Mean (SD)      54.4 (25.0)  48.5 (18.4)  0.127       Mean (SD)      84.1 (39.6)  92.8 (43.2)  0.4
           Median [min, max] 48.0 [19.0, 135]  43.0 [23.0, 108]  Median [min, max] 79.0 [26.0, 203]  85.0 [8.00, 170]
         Age                                                    Missing        10 (21.7%)   0 (0%)
           Mean (SD)      60.9 (5.96)  62.4 (6.59)  0.196      Perioperative   42 (91.3%)   30 (100%)    0.257
           Median [min, max] 62.0 [47.0, 73.0]  63.0 [45.0, 74.0]  complications
         ASA                                                    No             4 (8.7%)     0 (0%)
           1              18 (18.9%)   6 (14.0%)    0.164       Yes
           2              67 (70.5%)   36 (83.7%)              Patient characteristics between planned same-day LEP vs. inpatient, including age, ASA,
           3              10 (10.5%)   1 (2.3%)                RCRI, anesthesia, anticoagulation, prostate volume, and perioperative complications.
         RCRI
           0              86 (90.5%)   40 (93.0%)   0.876     POD-2.4. Table 2A. RARP same-day discharge success
           1              9 (9.5%)     3 (7.0%)               rate
         Anesthesia                                                             Planned      Planned    p
           General        95 (100%)    43 (100%)    <0.001                      inpatient (n=95) same-day
                                                                                             (n=43)
         Anticoagulated                                        Actual patient
           No             94 (98.9%)   41 (95.3%)   0.476      orientation
           Yes            1 (1.1%)     2 (4.7%)                 Hospitalized    95 (100%)    11 (25.6%)  <0.001
         Blood loss                                             Discharged      0 (0%)       32 (74.4%)
           Mean (SD)      231 (96.8)   198 (65.4)   0.0194     30-day emergency visit
           Median [min, max] 200 [100, 600]  200 [100, 500]     No              91 (95.8%)   35 (81.4%)  0.0142
         Perioperative                                          Yes             4 (4.2%)     8 (18.6%)
         Complications    83 (87.4%)   36 (83.7%)   0.757      Readmission
           No             12 (12.6%)   7 (16.3%)                No              93 (97.9%)   39 (90.7%)  0.142
           Yes                                                  Yes             2 (2.1%)     4 (9.3%)
         Patient characteristics between planned same-day RARP vs. inpatient, including age, ASA,   Rates of successful same-day discharge, duration of hospitalization, emergency consul-
         RCRI, anesthesia, anticoagulation, prostate volume, and perioperative complications.
                                                               tation, and readmission in planned same-day RARP vs. inpatient.

                                                CUAJ • June 2022 • Volume 16, Issue 6(Suppl1)                S9
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10