Page 37 - Poster Sessions] CUA 2022 Annual Meeting Abstracts
P. 37

Poster 5: Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility, Pelvic Pain, Infection, Pediatrics






         MP–5.5. Table 1. Result of sensitivity analyses for the primary outcome of sexual dysfunction
         Adverse event                Count               Expected count †  Empirical Bayes estimator  Reporting odds ratio*
                                                                        (5th percentile)     (95% CI)
         By indication (BPH vs. alopecia with finasteride)
           BPH                        165                 6.55          21.41                27.9 (23.7–32.7)
           Alopecia                   4309                88.02         47.62                64.9 (62.7–67.2)
         By age (<45 y and ≥45 y with finasteride)
           <45 y                      1329                29.17         43.31                56.4 (53.1–59.9)
           ≥45 y                      329                 13.35         22.23                27.3 (24.3–30.6)
         By dose (1 mg, 5 mg, and unknown dose of finasteride)
           1 mg                       4046                88.07         44.65                59.7 (57.7–61.8)
           5 mg                       1220                41.14         28.17                34.0 (32.0–36.1)
           Unknown                    2434                60.79         38.63                49.2 (17.1–51.4)
         Of other drugs with similar indications but different mechanisms
           Tamsulosin                 711                 57.72         11.53                13.0 (12.1–14.1)
           Minoxidil                  83                  43.49         1.57                 1.92 (1.54–2.38)
         Of dutasteride, overall, by age, and by indication
           Overall                    430                 17.61         22.28                26.8 (24.2–29.6)
           <45 y                      40                  1.21          22.44                38.5 (27.6–53.8)
           ≥45 y                      203                 11.72         15.17                18.7 (16.2–21.5)
           BPH                        399                 21.31         17.09                20.4 (18.4–22.6)
           Alopecia                   60                  1.42          30.10                51.40(38.9–68.0)
         By period
           Before 2012                1396                73.93         18.02                22.0 (20.8–23.3)
           After 2012                 5848                106.03        53.86                80.4 (78.0–82.9)
         † Expected count = (ni. n.j)/N where ni.and  n.j are the marginal counts and N is the sum of spontaneous report counts. *The reporting odds ratio (ROR) in spontaneous report databases al-
         lows for estimation of the relative risk.
        MP-5.6                                               tions were filled. However, for the 376 rejected applications, 250 (66.4%)
        Insurance approval rates for collagenase clostridium histolyticum   prescriptions were filled. Overall, 90% (80–100) of the cost of Xiaflex
        prior to discontinuation: A Canada-wide analysis     was covered in Canada among those with extended health benefits, with
        Taekhwan Chung , Benjamin Shiff , Ruben Blachman-Braun , Marc   an out-of-pocket expense of $210.40 (0–283.30).
                                 1
                                                    2
                     1
        Grenier , Ryan Flannigan , Premal Patel 1            Conclusions: Insurance coverage requests for Xiaflex were approved at
             3
                         4,5
        1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba,   a high rate in Canada despite some interprovincial variation. Approved
        Winnipeg, MB, Canada;  Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL,   patients were also very likely to proceed with therapy.
                           2
        United States;  BioScript Solutions, Moncton, NB, Canada;  Department of   References
                  3
                                               4
        Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;   1.  Gelbard M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJG, et al. Clinical efficacy,
        5 Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, United States  safety, and tolerability of collagenase clostridium histolyticum
        Introduction: Intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCh)   for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease in 2 large, double-
        was the first approved non-surgical treatment for Peyronie’s disease (PD)   blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies. J Urol
        following the results of the IMPRESS I and II trials.  CCh was recently   2013;190:199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.087
                                            1
        withdrawn from the European, Canadian, and Asian markets. The pri-  2.  Paladin Labs Inc. Healthcare Professional Information regarding dis-
                                                                                   ®
        mary reason for discontinuation cited by Endo Pharmaceuticals was poor   continuation of XIAFLEX . Published April 30, 2020. Available at:
        demand, partially due to lack of government reimbursement options.  Our   https://dupuytrencanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/60841-
                                                      2
        goal was to assess insurance approval rates and ultimately usage of CCh   002-Xiaflex_Discontinuation_Notice_04302020.pdf.
        across Canada to better understand the factors that led to its withdrawal.
        Methods: Data was obtained for all patients who had been prescribed   MP-5.7
        CCh for either PD or Dupuytren’s contracture through collaboration with   Baseline reproductive and sexual health knowledge among
        BioScript Solutions. Data were collected for all patients enrolled in the   undergraduate university and college students
        Xiaflex Access Program from April 2018 to June 2020. This data was used   Kunal Jain , Ryan Sun , Juan Mohadeb , Natasha Dhingra , Ruben
                                                                     1
                                                                                                        3
                                                                                          2
                                                                              1
        to determine the association of variables with insurance approval and   Blachman-Braun , Premal Patel 1
                                                                         4
        prescription filling. Relationship with insurance approval and prescription   1 Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba,
        filling was analyzed using univariable and multivariable-adjusted logistic   Winnipeg, MB, Canada;  College of Medicine, University of Manitoba,
                                                                               2
        regression analysis.                                 Winnipeg, MB, Canada;  Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto,
                                                                               3
        Results: We identified 3297 insurance coverage applications for Xiaflex   Toronto, ON, Canada;  Department of Urology, University of Miami,
                                                                              4
        from April 2018 to June 2020. Of all applications for PD, 695 (92.9%)   Miami, FL, United States
        applications were approved while 53 (7.1%) were rejected. Despite the   Introduction: Undergraduate students comprise of a large proportion of
        withdrawal of CCh from Canadian markets in 2021, coverage application   newly sexually active adults; however, literature on their reproductive and
        approval rates for 2018, 2019, and 2020 were 86.5%, 90.1%, and 89.1%,   sexual health knowledge is lacking. We sought to explore this knowledge
        respectively. Of all 2921 approved applications, 2594 (88.8%) prescrip-  gap to better address students’ needs.
                                                CUAJ • June 2022 • Volume 16, Issue 6(Suppl1)                S59
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42