Page 74 - Demo

144 CUAJ %u2022 APRIL 2025 %u2022 VOLUME 19, ISSUE 4 Kandi et al66. Li C-C, Yeh H-C, Lee H-Y, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without intracorporeal suturing. Surg Endosc 2016;30:1585-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4382-867. Oh JJ, Lee JK, Kim K, et al. Comparison of the width of peritumoral surgical margin in open and robotic partial nephrectomy: A propensity score matched analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0158027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.015802768. Pantelidou M, Challacombe B, McGrath A, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal cell carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016;39:1595-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1417-z69. Roberts J, Wong J, Haxhimolla H, et al. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: An Australian experience. ANZ J Surg 2016;86:926-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.1311770. Han K-S, Song GH, You D, et al. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in patients with T1 renal masses. J Endourol 2017;31:374-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.051771. Luciani LG, Chiodini S, Mattevi D, et al. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches: Results from a prospective cohort study. J Robot Surg 2017;11:333-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0660-272. Reynolds CR, Delto JC, Paulucci DJ, et al. Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for cT1a vs cT1b renal masses. BJU Int 2017;120:842-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.1396073. Simsek A, Yavuzsan AH, Colakoglu Y, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2017;89:93-6. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2017.2.9374. Azevedo AAP, Junior AR, Falsarella PM, et al. Image-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation: Five years experience, results, and followup. Eur J Radiol 2018;100:14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.00175. Borghesi M, Schiavina R, Chessa F, et al. Retroperitoneal robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal tumors: A matched-pair comparison of perioperative and early oncologic outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018;16:e391-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2017.09.01076. Breen DJ, King AJ, Patel N, et al. Image-guided cryoablation for sporadic renal cell carcinoma: Three- and five-year outcomes in 220 patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma. Radiology 2018;289:554-61. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.201818024977. Motoyama D, Aki R, Matsushita Y, et al. Early single-center experience with robotic partial nephrectomy using the da Vinci Xi: Comparative assessment with conventional open partial nephrectomy. Curr Urol 2019;13:13-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/00049930078. Park JM, Yang SW, Shin JH, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and partial nephrectomy for T1a renal masses: A retrospective single-center 60-month follow-up cohort study. Urol J 2019;16:44-9.79. Furukawa J, Kanayama H, Azuma H, et al. %u2018Trifecta%u2019 outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A large Japanese multicenter study. Int J Clin Oncol 2020;25:347-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01565-080. Zangiacomo RN, Martins GL, Viana PC, et al. Percutaneous thermoablation of small renal masses (T1a) in surgical candidate patients: Oncologic outcomes. Eur Radiol 2021;31:5370-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07496-z81. Bersang AB, S%u00f8ndergaard Mosholt KS, Verner Jensen C, et al. Safety and oncological outcome following radiofrequency ablation of small renal masses in a single center. Scand J Urol 2021;55:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2021.190038682. Watanabe H, Motoyama D, Sato R, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with small renal mass who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A prospective evaluation. J Endourol 2021;35:1644-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.025483. Benamran D, Grobet-Jeandin E, Msika J, et al. Preliminary outcomes after same-day discharge protocol for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A single centre experience. Urology 2022;164:145-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.03.02184. Bianchi L, Chessa F, Piazza P, et al. Percutaneous ablation or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for cT1a renal masses? A propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Urol 2022;29:222-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.1475885. Furukawa J, Hinata N, Teisima J, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with minimum followup of 5 years: A multicenter, prospective study in Japan. Int J Urol 2022;29:1038-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.1496086. Junker T, Duus L, Rasmussen BS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus percutaneous cryoablation of small renal cell carcinomas: A comparison of adverse events in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2022;33:1375-83.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2022.07.00787. Sri D, Malki M, Sarkar S, et al. Long-term experience of robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy as the default approach in the management of renal masses: Should the paradigm shift? J Robot Surg 2023;1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01582-2CORRESPONDENCE: Maryam Kandi, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; maryam.kandi@gmail.comVisit https://www.cua.org/UROpedia to complete the questionnaire associated with this article. This program is an Accredited Self-Assessment Program (Section 3) as defined by the Maintenance of Certification Program of RCPSC and approved by the CUA. You may claim a maximum of 1 hour of credit.