Page 3 - CUA guideline: Vasectomy
P. 3

Zini et al.




       azoospermia at three months than no interposition (OR   for possible scrotal bleeding or vaso-vagal reaction. It may
       0.42 [0.26, 0.70]). 4,23,24  However, fascial interposition may   be prudent to recommend that patients be driven home.
       increase the complication rate of vasectomy. 25       Men should be instructed about proper wound and scrotal
         Recommendation: Fascial interposition during vasectomy   care and short-term physical limitations. Men should be told
       is associated with a significantly higher rate of azoospermia   how to collect the semen sample (completeness and type of
       at three months than no interposition (Grade B).      container) and reminded of the importance of submitting the
                                                             sample to the laboratory in a timely fashion (within 30‒60
       Cautery vs. fascial interposition                     minutes after producing the sample). They should also be
                                                             told that semen samples should be collected after an absti-
       In a comparative (case-control) study, cautery of the vas   nence period of two or more days and no more than seven
       was associated with a lower risk of failure (defined as >100   days, and maintained at body temperature before delivery
       000 sperm in the ejaculate) than fascial interposition (1%   to the laboratory. A list of local laboratories that perform
       vs. 4.9%, OR 4.8 [1.6-14.3]). 3                       proper post-vasectomy semen analysis should be given to
         Recommendation: Cautery of the vas is associated with   the patient. The men must be reminded to use other con-
       a lower risk of failure (defined as >100 000 sperm in the   traceptive measures until post-vasectomy semen testing has
       ejaculate) than fascial interposition (Grade B).      confirmed absence of motile sperm.
         Arguably, the above findings on azoospermia rates are
       somewhat confusing (“fascial interposition is better than no   5. Post-vasectomy semen testing
       fascial interposition” and “cautery is better than fascial inter-
       position”).  However, the take-home message is that both   The post-vasectomy semen analysis should be performed
       cautery and fascial interposition are the best vas occlusion   on the whole (unprocessed) semen and on the centrifuged
       methods.                                              semen to confirm the absence of low numbers of motile
                                                             sperm. The laboratory should give an estimation of sperm
       3. Contraceptive efficacy of vasectomy                concentration or numbers of spermatozoa observed per
                                                             high-power field (×400 magnification). 28-30
       The early failure rate of vasectomy (presence of motile sperm   It is important to recognize that compliance with post-
       in the ejaculate at three to six months post-vasectomy) is   vasectomy semen testing is a significant issue, with up to
       in the range of 0.3‒9% and has been linked to operator   30% of men failing to submit a single sample. 31,32
       experience and the technique used by the surgeon.  Both
                                                    25
       technical failure (e.g., missed vas deferens) and early recana-  One vs. two post-vasectomy samples
       lization of the vas deferens have been proposed as plausible
       explanations.                                         Surveys have shown significant variability in the post-
         Late failure has been reported to be in the range of   vasectomy testing protocols.   Most agree that a single azo-
                                                                                     33
       0.04–0.08% (approximately 1/2000 cases) and is defined   ospermic semen sample is sufficient to deem the vasectomy
       as the presence of motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate after   effective. 30,34  However, because spermatozoa are detected
       documented azoospermia in two post-vasectomy semen    in 10‒40% of the three-month post-vasectomy samples
       analyses. 7,26   In most cases, late failure is first identified as   (the percent depends on the vasectomy technique and the
       a pregnancy and later confirmed by semen analysis (docu-  accuracy of the semen analysis), it may be necessary for up
       menting presence of motile spermatozoa).              to 40% of the men to submit a second semen sample. 25,35
         The reappearance of sperm (mostly immotile) after docu-  As such, requesting two semen samples at the onset may
       mented azoospermia in two post-vasectomy semen samples   be more efficient, as this may reduce the number of post-
       may be much higher than 1/2000 according to the reported   vasectomy counselling sessions (e.g., phone calls or office
       identification of spermatozoa in nearly 10% of ejaculates   visits), but this may also reduce the overall compliance. 32
       from men undergoing semen assessment prior to vasectomy   Recommendation: The evaluation of two post-operative
              27
       reversal.  It is unlikely that the reappearance (or persistence)   semen samples is a better predictor of success than the
       of immotile sperm years after vasectomy is of clinical sig-  evaluation of a single semen sample (Grade C).
       nificance, as this has not been associated with documented
       pregnancies. 28,29                                    Timing of post-vasectomy testing

       4. Postoperative counselling                          Although most studies suggest that post-vasectomy testing
                                                             be conducted at three months after vasectomy, the issue
       After the vasectomy has been performed, men should be   remains debatable, with some studies suggesting earlier
       told to remain in the clinic for 15‒20 minutes to be assessed   examinations (with determination of failure based on the


       E276                                     CUAJ • July-August 2016 • Volume 10, Issues 7-8
   1   2   3   4   5