Page 2 - Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): CUA/CUOG
P. 2

Saad et al



         In patients who develop CRPC, the addition or change   with standard ADT in patients with nmCRPC at high risk
                                                                                                5
       of first-generation androgen receptor antagonists may be   for progression (PSADT of ≤10 months).  The median MFS
       considered (Level 3, Weak recommendation).            was 40.5 months with apalutamide and 16.2 months with
         To date, no study using first-generation androgen recep-  placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for metastasis or death 0.28; 95%
       tor antagonists, when introduced in the CRPC setting, has   confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.35; p<0.001). Secondary
       shown survival benefits; most trials have been small, were   endpoints analyzed, including progression-free survival
       not designed to evaluate overall survival (OS), and were   (PFS) (local and distant), time to PSA progression, and time
       heavily confounded by future treatments used. In patients   to subsequent therapy, were all statistically significantly
                                                                      5
       treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)   improved.  Although more adverse events were reported in
       agonist/antagonist monotherapy or those who have had an   patients receiving ADT + apalutamide vs. ADT + placebo,
       orchidectomy, the addition of androgen receptor antagonists,   patient-reported health-related quality of life was similar
       such as bicalutamide, can offer modest PSA responses that   between both groups. 8
       are short-lived in 30–35% of patients. 4
         For patients who have undergone total androgen block-  Enzalutamide
       ade (TAB), the anti-androgen (AA) should be discontinued   Enzalutamide is a second-generation AR ligand-binding
       to test for an anti-androgen withdrawal response (AAWD).   domain inhibitor. This agent was tested in combination
       Changing AA or using corticosteroids with or without keto-  with standard ADT in patients with nmCRPC at high risk
       conazole have been noted to cause transient PSA reduc-  for progression (PSADT of ≤10 months).  The median MFS
                                                                                                6
       tions in about 30% of patients but have not been shown to   was 36.6 months with enzalutamide and 14.7 months with
       improve any of the clinically meaningful outcome measures.    placebo (HR for metastasis or death 0.29; 95% CI 0.24–
                                                             0.35; p<0.001). Secondary endpoints analyzed, including
       Non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC)                          PFS (local and distant), time to PSA progression, and time
                                                             to subsequent therapy, were all statistically significantly
       For men with high-risk nmCRPC, defined as a PSA doubling   improved. Although more adverse events were reported in
       time (PSADT) of less than 10 months, with an estimated life   patients receiving ADT + enzalutamide vs. ADT + placebo,
       expectancy of greater than five years should be offered apalu-  patient-reported health-related quality of life was similar
       tamide or enzalutamide (Level 1, Strong recommendation).   between both groups. 9
         Until 2018, there was no standard of care and no approved   Both apalutamide and enzalutamide have received Health
       regimen for the nmCRPC state. The risk of progression to   Canada approval for use in high-risk nmCRPC.
       clinical metastases or death is linked to PSADT. PSADT of
       less than 10 months has been correlated to worse outcome   Detection of metastases and imaging in untreated patients
       and has been used in recent clinical trials as the definition   For patients who progress on ADT without evidence of distant
       for high-risk nmCRPC. Patients in these studies were ran-  metastases, it is suggested to screen for bone metastases with
       domized to treatment + ADT vs. placebo + ADT until the   bone scans and monitor for lymph node and visceral metasta-
       appearance of metastases on conventional imaging (bone   ses/progression with imaging of the abdomen/pelvis and chest.
       scan and computed tomography [CT]/magnetic resonance     Patients with a rapid PSADT (<10 months) or elevated PSA
       imaging [MRI] of the abdomen/chest). To date, two phase 3   levels (>20) are at high risk for developing metastases ear-
                                                                 3
       studies have led to Health Canada approvals for the treatment   lier.  Imaging in these patients should be performed every 3–6
       of nmCRPC in Canada. Both studies used second-generation   months. Patients with a slower PSADT (>10 months) should
       androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies (apalutamide and   be screened every 6–12 months (Expert opinion). Imaging
       enzalutamide) and reported similar results in significantly   techniques most commonly used include nuclear bone scans
       improving the primary endpoint of metastases-free survival   and abdominal/pelvic CT and chest X-ray. The role of positron-
       (MFS). Median OS, a secondary endpoint, was not reached   emission tomography (PET), such as prostate specific membrane
       but at interim analysis showed a non-significant improve-  antigen (PSMA)-PET are still unclear and the benefits unknown.
                        5,6
       ment in both studies.  Recently, darolutamide was tested in a   If and when metastases are detected, patients should
       similar patient population of high-risk nmCRPC with positive   be treated according to guidelines for metastatic CRPC
       results. At this time, this agent is not approved in Canada. 7  (mCRPC). How patients are treated in the mCRPC state will
                                                             depend on what they received prior to becoming mCRPC.
       Summary of results
                                                             Treatment of mCRPC
       Apalutamide
       Apalutamide is a second-generation AR ligand-binding   Since mCRPC is generally associated with a high risk of mor-
       domain inhibitor. This agent was tested in combination   bidity and cancer-related mortality, patients with mCRPC


       308                                       CUAJ • October 2019 • Volume 13, Issue 10
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7