Page 25 - August 2022_Fulldraftforflipbook_revised
P. 25

CUA guideline: LUTS/BPH



       39.  Kaplan SA, He W, Koltun WD, et al. Solifenacin plus tamsulosin combination treatment in men with   60.  Kordan Y, Canda AE, Koseoglu E, et al. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: A systematic review. J Clin
          lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction: A randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol   Med 2020;9:1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061798
          2013;63:158-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.003  61.  Scarcella S, Castellani D, Gauhar V, et al. Robotic-assisted vs. open simple prostatectomy: Results
       40.  Drake MJ, Chapple C, Sokol R, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of single-tablet combinations of   from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Invsti Clin Urol 2021;62:631-40.
          solifenacin and tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system in men with storage and voiding lower   https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210297
          urinary tract symptoms: Results from the NEPTUNE Study and NEPTUNE II open-label extension. Eur Urol   62.  Herrmann TR. Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation. World J Urol 2016;34:1353-5.
          2015;67:262-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.013  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1922-3
       41.  Ichihara K, Masumori N, Fukuta F, et al. A randomized controlled study of the efficacy of tamsulosin   63.  Chen CH, Chung CH, Chu HC, et al. Surgical outcome of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the pros-
          monotherapy and its combination with mirabegron for overactive bladder induced by benign prostatic   tate: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia 2020;52:e13612. https://doi.org/10.1111/
          obstruction. J Urol 2015;193:921-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.091  and.13612
       42.  Oelke M, Giuliano F, Mirone V, et al. Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved   64.  El Tayeb MM, Jacob JM, Bhojani N, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients requiring
          lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, random-  anticoagulation. J Endourol 2016;30:805-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0070
          ized, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Urol 2012;61:917-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.  65.  Rivera M, Krambeck A, Lingeman J. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients requiring
          eururo.2012.01.013                                    anticoagulation. Curr Urol Rep 2017;18:77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0746-z
       43.  Gacci M, Corona G, Salvi M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase   66.  Romero-Otero J, García-González L, García-Gómez B, et al. Factors influencing intraoperative blood
          5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign   loss in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic
          prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2012;61:994-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.033  hyperplasia: A large, multicenter analysis. Urology 2019;132:177-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
       44.  Weiss JP, Herschorn S, Albei CD, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose desmopressin orally disintegrating   urology.2019.06.024
          tablet in men with nocturia: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel   67.  Ibrahim A, Alharbi M, Elhilali MM, et al. 18 years of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A single-
          group study. J Urol 2013;190:965-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.112  center experience. J Urol 2019;202:795-800. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000280
       45.  Habib FK Wyllie MG. Not all brands are created equal: A comparison of selected components   68.  Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser
          of different brands of Serenoa repens extract. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2004;7:195-200.   enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: Results at 7 years. BJU Int
          https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500746               2012;109:408-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10359.x
       46.  Barry MJ, Meleth S, Kreder KH, et al. Effect of increasing doses of saw palmetto on lower urinary tract   69.  Zhu L, Chen S, Yang S, et al. Electrosurgical enucleation vs. bipolar transurethral resection for prostates
          symptoms: A randomized trial. JAMA 2011;306:1344-51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1364  larger than 70 ml: A prospective, randomized trial with 5-year followup. J Urol 2013;189:1427-31.
       47.  Tacklind J, Macdonald R, Rutks I, et al. Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.117
          Syst Rev 2012;12:Cd001423. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub3  70.  Elshal AM, Soltan M, El-Tabey NA, et al. Randomized trial of bipolar resection vs. holmium laser enucleation
       48.  Wilt T, Ishani A, Mac Donald R, et al. Pygeum africanum for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database   vs. Greenlight laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate for treatment of large benign prostate obstruction:
          Syst Rev 2002;1:Cd001044. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001423  3-year outcomes. BJU Int 2020;126:731-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15161
       49.  Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann AJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes   71.  Świniarski PP, Stępień S, Dudzic W, et al. Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (TmLEP) vs. transure-
          and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from   thral resection of the prostate (TURP): Evaluation of early results. Cent European J Urol 2012;65:130-4.
          benign prostatic obstruction: An update. Eur Urol 2015;67:1066-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.  https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2012.03.art6
          eururo.2014.06.017                                 72.  Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Long-term results, reoperation
       50.  Reich O, Gratzke C, Backmann A, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and early outcome of transurethral resection   rate, and possible impact of the learning curve. Eur Urol 2007;52:1465-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
          of the prostate: A prospective, multicenter evaluation of 10 654 patients. J Urol 2008;180:246-9.   eururo.2007.04.074
          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058         73.  Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, et al. A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing GreenLight-
       51.  Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, et al. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following   XPS laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment
          transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement.   of benign prostatic obstruction: Two-year outcomes of the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 2016;69:94-102.
          Eur Urol 2010;58:384-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.054
       52.  Mamoulakis C, Sofras F, de la Rosette J, et al. Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate   74.  Ajib K, Mansoura M, Zanaty M, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 180-W XPS-
          for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev   Greenlight laser: Five-year experience of safety, efficiency, and functional outcomes. Can Urol Assoc J
          2014;1:CD009629. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009629.pub3  2018;12:E318-24. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4895
       53.  Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Multescu R, et al. Bipolar plasma vaporization vs. monopolar and bipolar TURP:   75.  Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, et al. 180‐W XPS GreenLight laser vaporization vs. transurethral
          A prospective, randomized, long-term comparison. Urology 2011;78:930-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.  resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6‐month safety and effi-
          urology.2011.03.072                                   cacy results of a European multicenter, randomized trial — the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 2014;65:931.
       54.  Muslumanoglu AY, Yuruk E, Binbay M, et al. Transurethral resection of prostate with plasmaki-  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040
          netic energy: 100 months results of a prospective, randomized trial. BJU Int 2012;110:546-9.   76.  Bachmann A, Schurch L, Ruszat R, et al. Photoselective vaporization (PVP) vs. transurethral resection of
          https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10770.x      the prostate (TURP): A prospective bicenter study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome.
       55.  Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, et al. Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from   Eur Urol 2005;48:965-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.001
          a contemporary series of patients. Urology 2004;64:306-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urol-  77.  Rajih E, Tholomier C, Hueber PA, et al. Evaluation of surgical outcomes with Photoselective GreenLight XPS
          ogy.2004.03.033                                       laser vaporization of the prostate in high medical risk men with benign prostatic enlargement: A multicenter
       56.  Lin, Y, Wu X, Xu A, et al. Transurethral enucleation of the prostate vs. transvesical open prostatectomy for   study. J Endourol 2017;31:686-93. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0782
          large benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.   78.  Nguyen DD, Sadri I, Law K, et al. Impact of the presence of a median lobe on functional outcomes of
          World J Urol 2016;34:1207-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1735-9  greenlight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP): An analysis of the Global Greenlight Group (GGG)
       57.  Naspro R, Gomez Sancha F, Manica M, et al. From “gold standard” resection to reproducible “future   Database. World J Urol 2021;39:3881-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03529-w
          standard” endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: What we know about anatomical enucleation. Minerva   79.  Lee DJ, Rieken M, Halpern J et al. Laser vaporization of the prostate with the 180‐W XPS‐Greenlight laser
          Urol Nefrol 2017;69:446-58. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02834-X  in patients with ongoing platelet aggregation inhibition and oral anticoagulation. Urology 2016;91:167.
       58.  Nestler S, Bach T, Herrmann T, et al. Surgical treatment of large volume prostates: A matched pair   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.021
          analysis comparing the open, endoscopic (ThuVEP) and robotic approach. World J Urol 2019;37:1927-31.   80.  Meskawi M, Hueber PA, Valdivieso R, et al. Complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patient
          https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2585-z             with cardiovascular disease on antithrombotic medication treated with the 532 nm laser photo-
       59.  Autorino R, Zarger H, Mariano MB, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic   vaporization Greenlight XPS-180 W for benign prostate hyperplasia. World J Urol 2019;37:1671-8.
          simple prostatectomy: A European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol 2015;68:86-94.   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2560-8
          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.044



                                                 CUAJ • August 2022 • Volume 16, Issue 8                      255
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30