Page 7 - CUA Best Practice Report: Diagnosis and management of radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis
P. 7

BPR: Radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis




                                                             therapies, as only alum irrigation has been shown to provide
                       Initial assessment and early management  improvement within days of being started. HA and SPP both
                                                             treat urinary symptoms associated with hemorrhagic cystitis
         Initial assessment          Presenting with clots & retention  in addition to hematuria.
         • History and physical      • Continuous bladder irrigation
         • Laboratory evaluation  if  and hydration             The third category, “Refractory and life-threatening hema-
         • Axial imaging preferably CT Uro  • Inpatient monitoring and
         • Cystoscopy ± fulgerization  transfusion as indicated  turia,” includes patients who have previously been trialed
                                     • Cystoscopy, clot evacuation ±   and failed with treatment options from groups 1 and 2, and
                                      fulgerization
                                                             continue to have symptomatic hematuria that poses a threat
                                                             to their safety and well-being. In these patients, treatment
                  Persistent or recurrent clinically significant hematuria
                                                             options typically have a rapid onset of action and have been
                                                             proven to be effective, but may be associated with significant
                                                             morbidity to the patient. Less invasive procedures, such as
         Intravesical alum  HBOT           HA or SPP
         • Inpatient tx in those  or  • Inpatient or   or  • Outpatient in stable  embolization or formalin instillation, should be attempted
          without renal failure  outpatient in stable  patients, especially
                           patients         those with significant   prior to surgical therapy. Once a mainstay of treatment, and
                                            LUTS             commonly recommended in many former treatment algo-
                                                             rithms, we recommend caution with the usage of formalin
           *For stable recurrent patients, multiple strategies and attempts may be used prior to
                   proceeding with more invasive and irreversible options  instillations, with special care to limit contact time, use the
                                                             least concentrated formulation necessary, and to prevent sys-
                      Refractory and life-threatening hematuria  temic uptake or refluxing into the upper tracts. Clinicians and
                                                             patients need to be aware of the high risk associated with cys-
         Transarterial embolization  Definitive surgical management  tectomy in post-radiation patients before proceeding to surgi-
         • Preference for selective or  • Consideration for urinary
          superselective embolization  then  diversion with or without   cal intervention. In patients whom a cystectomy would not be
         Formalin                     cystectomy based on    appropriate, or with a limited life span, temporary diversion
         • Limit contact, uptake, and reflux  individual patient factors
                                                             with either percutaneous nephrostomy tubes or cutaneous
                                                             ureterostomies may be considered as an alternative.
       Fig. 1. Treatment recommendations. CT Uro: computed tomography urogram;
       HA: hyaluronic acid; HBOT: hyperbaric oxygen therapy; LUTS; lower urinary
       tract symptom; SPP: sodium pentosan polysulfate; tx: treatment.  Conclusion

       rectable factors, such as infection, malignancy, or coagu-  RHC remains a challenging medical condition that often
       lopathies, should be treated if clinically possible.   presents in a frail and vulnerable population. In this report,
         The second group, patients with persistent or recurrent   we have presented a general approach and suggestions for
       clinically significant hematuria, may apply to those who   management, as well as an overview of key research sup-
       have required continuous bladder irrigation, irrigation, and   porting specific therapies. These guidelines should always be
       clot evacuation as an inpatient and continue to have hema-  used in the context of an individual patient’s presentation,
       turia, but also acknowledges that there are many patients   and may continue to evolve, as more evidence becomes
       who have recurrent hematuria that is clinically significant   available on the subject.
       who may benefit from treatment as an outpatient. The defini-
       tion of “clinically significant” here may be broadly applied   Competing interests: Dr. Saad reports personal fees and research grants from Amgen Inc, Astellas,
       to any gross hematuria that is causing a marked burden   Bayer, Janssen, and Sanofi. Dr. Lukka is a speaker for Astellas; has received grants and/or honoraria
       on patients or negatively impacting their day-to-day living.   from Abbvie, Actavis, Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Ferring, Janssen, Sanofi, and Tersera; owns stock
       Treatments recommended for patients in this group have   and options in Vertex Pharmaceutical; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Bayer
       been shown to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated by most   and Janssen. Dr. Kapoor has been an advisor for and has participated in clinical trials supported
                                                             by Amgen, Astellas, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. The remaining authors report no
       patients. The four recommended treatment options here   competing personal or financial interest related to this work.
       were chosen because they have evidence replicated from
       multiple centres, are clinically available in Canada, and
       have been approved and proven in comparable patholo-  This paper has been peer-reviewed.
       gies. As more research continues to be done on radiation
       cystitis, we may be able to add further therapies to this
       group. HBOT is offered here as initial therapy to reflect the
       growing amount of evidence that suggest it is an effective   References
       and safe treatment for RHC, including in those presenting
       with high-grade toxicities. Within this group, a clinician   1. Marks LB, Carroll PR, Dugan TC, et al. The response of the urinary bladder, urethra, and ureter to radiation
       may consider onset of action as a deciding factor between   and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1995;31:1257-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-
                                                                3016(94)00431-J

                                                 CUAJ • February 2019 • Volume 13, Issue 2                    21
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9