Page 4 - Long-term surveillance following resection of pheochromocytoma
P. 4

BPR: Pheochromocytoma followup




       adrenal disease located in the skull base/neck and second-  The specific indications for each imaging test are beyond the
                             20
       ary to mutations in SDHx.  Evidence suggests these tumors   scope of this review but can be found in the 2014 Endocrine
       lack the biosynthetic machinery necessary for catecholamine   Society Clinical Practice Guideline on pheochromocytomas
       production. In such cases, imaging studies are the principal   and paragangliomas. 7
       means of detecting tumors. Such patients remain at risk for
       the development of biochemically active tumors after initial   Recommendation 8: For biochemical recurrence, we
       tumor resection. 21                                   suggest CT/MRI as first-line imaging modalities, and
                                                             123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy as second-
       Recommendation 7: We suggest imaging tests be obtained   line (Weak recommendation, Very low-quality evidence).
       every 1–2 years, in addition to yearly metanephrines for
       patients with biochemically negative disease (Weak rec-  Malignant pheochromocytoma
       ommendation, Very low-quality evidence).
                                                             Malignant pheochromocytomas are rare. They are associated
       Imaging                                               with significant morbidity due their ability to invade organs
                                                             and dysregulate the autonomic nervous system.  Given its
                                                                                                      23
       CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are excellent   rarity, there are few prospective studies investigating potential
       imaging modalities for characterizing adrenal lesions. Imaging   therapies for the disease, and impact on survival and quality
       should be sought in patients with elevated metanephrines pos-  of life is difficult to ascertain. Management is largely guided
       toperatively, as well as patients whose metanephrines were nor-  by retrospective studies’ findings, expert consensus, and clin-
       mal or not measured preoperatively. A subset of patients with   ical experience. Therapies that have been pursued, include
       elevated postoperative metanephrines will have no detectable   surgery, therapeutic  131 I-labeled MIBG internal radiotherapy,
       disease on CT or MRI. Historically, metaiodobenzylguanidine   chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and watchful waiting. 23
       (MIBG) scintigraphy has been the preferred test in this setting
       to localize disease. MIBG is a small-molecule analog of nor-  Recommendation 9: Malignant pheochromocytoma treat-
       epinephrine, and when tagged with iodine, is a highly sensi-  ment should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting that
       tive and specific test for pheochromocytoma.  More recently,   includes surgeons, interventional radiologists, endocrinolo-
                                            4
       fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography   gists, oncologists, and nuclear medicine physicians (Clinical
       ( 18 F-FDG PET) has emerged for definitive staging in patients   principle).
       with pheochromocytoma. In a study of over 200 patients with
                                              18
       adrenal and extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma,  F-FDG PET   Conclusions
       had superior test characteristics compared to CT, MRI, and
       MIBG scintigraphy for almost all patients. 22 18 F-FDG PET,   The risk of recurrence following complete resection of pheo-
       however, is not widely available and is limited due to cost.   chromocytoma is low but significant. Recurrences can occur

        Table 1. Summary of recommendations
                                          Recommendation                                  Strength of   Quality of
                                                                                        recommendation  evidence
        1         We recommend all patients with PPGLs be considered for referral for genetic testing  Strong  Moderate
        2  We suggest repeating plasma and/or 24-hour urinary metanephrines at first postoperative followup to   Strong  Low
                                       ensure complete resection.
        3   We suggest monitoring for PPGL recurrence by annually measuring plasma free metanephrines and/  Strong  Low
                                or 24-hour urinary fractionated metanephrines.
        4   We suggest annual followup for at least 10 years following complete resection to monitor for local or   Weak  Very low
                                   metastatic recurrences or new tumors.
        5    We suggest high-risk patients (young, genetic disease, larger tumor, and/or a paraganglioma) be   Weak  Very low
                                     offered lifelong annual followup.
        6   We suggest using annual clonidine suppression or chromogranin A testing for followup of patients   Weak  Very low
                                     with positive preoperative results.
        7     We suggest imaging tests be obtained every 1–2 years, in addition to yearly metanephrines for   Weak  Very low
                                patients with biochemically negative disease.
        8         For biochemical recurrence, we suggest CT/MRI as first-line imaging modalities, and   Weak  Very low
                         123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy as second-line.
        9   Malignant pheochromocytoma treatment should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting including   Clinical principle
            surgeons, interventional radiologists, endocrinologists, oncologists, and nuclear medicine physicians.
        CT: computed tomography; MRI magnetic resonance imaging; PPGL: pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

                                                CUAJ • December 2019 • Volume 13, Issue 12                    375
   1   2   3   4   5