Page 1 - Flipbook
P. 1

CUA BEST PRACTICE REPORT







       Canadian Urological Association Best Practice Report: Catheter use





       Lysanne Campeau, MDCM, PhD ; Samer Shamout, MDCM, PhD ; Richard J. Baverstock, MD ;
                                     1
                                                                                             2
                                                                  1
       Kevin V. Carlson, MD ; Dean S. Elterman, MD ; Duane R. Hickling, MD ; Stephen S. Steele, MD ; Blayne Welk, MD 6
                                                                                              5
                                                3
                                                                       4
                          2
       1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Montreal Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada;  vesia [Alberta Bladder Centre] and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
                                                                      2
       University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada;  Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;  Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada;
                                                                  4
                              3
       5 Department of Urology,Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada;  Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
                                          6

       Cite as: Can Urol Assoc J 2020;14(7):E281-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6697  data obtained from numerous published meta-analyses and
                                                             original studies identified through a literature search using
                                                             PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library database. The
       Published online May 8, 2020                          bibliographies of relevant articles were also searched to avoid
                                                             exclusion of important studies. The following narrative review
                                                             concentrates on systematic reviews, related guidelines, and
       Introduction                                          comparative studies. Articles included in this statement were
                                                             reviewed using methodology consistent with the Grading of
       Catheters are widely used for urinary retention or incon-  Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation
       tinence and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction   (GRADE) for evidence synthesis and recommendations.
       (NLUTD). This includes intermittent catheterization (IC),
       indwelling urethral catheters, and suprapubic catheters. Both   1. Types of catheters
       intermittent and indwelling catheterization provide means
       for long-term, effective urinary drainage with the aim to   The indications for urinary catheterization may be prolonged
       protect the upper urinary tract, improve urinary continence,   and sometimes irreversible (Table 1). There are two important
       and minimize urinary tract complications.  However, urinary   populations that tend to require catheters. First, approxi-
                                          1
       catheters can be associated with an increased risk of urinary   mately 5–10% of residents of long-term care facilities in
       tract infections, incontinence, calculi, and compromised kid-  Canada have bladder dysfunction managed with chronic
                                                                           2
       ney function.                                         catheterization.  Second, people with NLUTD from a neu-
         IC is generally the gold standard method of bladder   rologic lesion may need catheters because of failure to store
       drainage. Although technology has progressed in the field   and/or empty urine from the bladder (which results in  incon-
       of catheter design, material, and technique, there is lim-  tinence and/or urinary retention).
       ited high-quality evidence and few good practice recom-
       mendations around catheter usage in chronic conditions   1.1. Indwelling catheterization (urethral or suprapubic)
       such as NLUTD. Our objective was to review the evidence
       around the use of long-term urinary catheters in patients with   Optimal bladder management is selected according to ana-
       chronic conditions and make practice recommendations for   tomical factors and patients’ preferences. Indwelling cath-
       physicians in Canada who manage catheters in this popula-  eters are often used initially after a spinal cord injury (SCI),
       tion. We pay specific attention to the current best evidence   however, patients are recommended to transition to IC if
       of the available techniques, design, material, and practices   possible.  Despite the problems associated with indwelling
                                                                     3
       of intermittent self-catheterization and its position in the   catheters, many patients with a SCI adopt these catheters
       treatment pathway.                                    over time. Long-term use of indwelling catheters is often rec-
                                                             ommended as the last resort, except for quadriplegic patients
       Methods                                               with impaired dexterity or those who are bedridden, or in
                                                             situations where IC is difficult or impossible.
                                                                                                    4
       This best practice report provides a brief and comprehensive   Suprapubic catheterization (SPC) offers certain advan-
       discussion of studies examining catheter management for   tages compared to urethral catheters: it may improve inde-
       impaired bladder emptying in the setting of neurogenic and   pendence, facilitate engagement in sexual activities, and
       non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. It is based on   decrease the risk of epididymitis.  Some studies have sug-
                                                                                          1

                                                                                                             E281
                                                  CUAJ • July 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 7
                                                  © 2020 Canadian Urological Association
   1   2   3   4   5   6