Page 7 - Flipbook
P. 7

BPR: Catheter use




        Table 3. Summary recommendations
        Section                                         Recommendation                        Strength of  Quality of
                                                                                              statement  evidence
        Type of catheter              We recommend individualizing the selection of appropriate bladder   Strong  Moderate
                                    management strategy (IC, indwelling urethral, or suprapubic catheter) in
                                  accordance with anatomic factors, bladder characteristics, motor and cognitive
                                         functions, patient preference, and associated quality of life.
        Catheter-related complications:   We recommend using intermittent catheters over indwelling catheters for   Strong  Moderate
        UTIs                      long-term use due to a lower risk of UTIs. Routine use of antimicrobial coated
                                                   catheters is not recommended.
        Catheter-related complications:   For those using intermittent catheters, we suggest using single PVC (as   Weak  Low
        UTIs                      opposed to multiple-use PVC), and special hydrophilic-coated catheters or pre-
                                       lubricated catheters, as they may decrease the frequency of UTIs.
        Catheter-related complications:   We suggest using hydrophilic catheters, as they may cause less urethral   Weak  Moderate
        Urethral trauma                                     trauma.
        Catheter-related complications:   There is no evidence to suggest that the type of intermittent catheter impacts   Weak  Weak
        Urethral trauma                             urethral stricture formation.
        Patient perspective        We recommend offering hydrophilic or pre-lubricated catheters to patients   Strong  Moderate
                                              because of an improved bladder related QOL.
        Economic analysis        We suggest offering patients, if possible, HC catheters, as they are cost-effective   Moderate  Moderate
                                  compared to single-use uncoated catheters due to the decreased incidence of
                                                     UTIs and increased QOL.
        HC: hydrophilic-coated; IC: intermittent catheterization; QOL: quality of life; UTI: urinary tract infection.

       material, cleaning method, and/or catheterization technique   Duchesnay, Ferring, Medtronic, and Pfizer; has received grants/honoraria from Boston Scientific and
       remain controversial topics in urology.               Pfizer; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.
         The preferred IC strategy varies by settings and practices.   Dr. Hickling has been an advisory board member for Pfizer; a speakers’ bureau member for Allergan,
       There is no evidence that there is one best catheter for all   Astellas, and Pfizer; has received grants/honoraria from Allergan, Astellas, and Pfizer; and has
       patients. Selection of the ideal IC type/technique is a complex   participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas. The remaining authors report no competing
                                                             personal or financial interests related to this work.
       balance between patient’s motor functions, acceptance of the
       procedure, QOL, and the economic implications. Whenever
       possible, hydrophilic-coated or prelubricated catheters should   Prior to publication, this guideline underwent review by the CUA Guidelines Committee, CUA members
       be proposed to the patient as the first treatment option   at large, the CUAJ Editorial Board, and the CUA Executive Board.
       because they appear to lower the risk of UTI, may result in
       less urethral trauma, and have higher convenience and ease
       of use compared to conventional uncoated catheters.
         Reuse of catheters may still be considered in specific   References
       clinical scenarios, however, the patient should be made
       aware there are concerns regarding efficacy and that there   1.  Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured
       is limited evidence to support cleansing techniques for a   patients. J Urol 2000;163:768-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67800-7
       single-use product. Long-term cost-effectiveness of single-  2.  Nicolle LE, Committee SL-TC. Urinary tract infections in long-term-care facilities. Infect Control Hosp
                                                                Epidemiol 2001;22:167-75. https://doi.org/10.1086/501886
       use HC catheters was established from the perspective of   3.  Peatfield R, Burt A, Smith P. Suprapubic catheterization after spinal cord injury: A followup report. Paraplegia
       several international healthcare systems.                1983;21:220-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1983.35
         Debate continues to linger regarding the best catheter   4.  Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu CD, et al. Randomized crossover trial of single use hydrophilic coated vs
       material and/or technique in which upper urinary tract   multiple use polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization to determine incidence of urinary
                                                                infection. J Urol 2015;194:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.096
       deterioration can be prevented while minimizing treatment-  5.  Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:609-22.
       related morbidity. Therefore, further high-quality RCTs are   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70376-7
       warranted.                                             6.  Saint S, Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Should we? Can we? How? Arch Int Med
                                                                1999;159:800-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.8.800
       Competing interests: Dr. Campeau has been an advisory board and speakers’ bureau member   7.  Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, et al. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary
       for Astellas and Pfizer; has received grants/honoraria from Allergan, Astellas, and Pfizer; and has   tract disease. J Urol 2002;167:1131-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(02)80359-7
       participated in clinical trials supported by Pfizer. Dr. Baverstock has been a speaker for Allergan,   8.  Cornejo-Dávila V, Durán-Ortiz S, Pacheco-Gahbler C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with
       Astellas, BSCI, and Pfizer; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas and Pfizer. Dr.   spinal cord injury treated with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Urology 2017;99:260-4.
                                                                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.024
       Carlson has been an advisory board member for Astellas and Pfizer; has received travel honoraria   9.  Afsar S, Yemisci O, Cosar S, et al. Compliance with clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord
       from Allergan; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas and Pfizer. Dr. Elterman   injury patients: A long-term followup study. Spinal Cord 2013;51:645. https://doi.org/10.1038/
       has been an advisory board and speakers’ bureau member for Allergan, Astellas, Boston Scientific,   sc.2013.46

                                                  CUAJ • July 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 7                      E287
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9