Page 8 - Flipbook

Campeau et al

10. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated 34. Stensballe J, Looms D, Nielsen PN, et al. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization
urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases reduce urethral micro trauma: A prospective, randomized, participant-blinded, crossover study of three dif-
Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:625-63. https://doi.org/10.1086/650482 ferent types of catheters. Eur Urol 2005;48:978-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.009
11. Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, et al. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral 35. Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen K, Hansen HV. Urethral epithelial cells on the surface on hydrophilic catheters
catheterization. N Engl J Med 1974;291:215-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197408012910501 after intermittent catheterization: Crossover study with two catheters. Spinal Cord 1999;37:299-300.
12. Raz R, Schiller D, Nicolle LE. Chronic indwelling catheter replacement before antimicrobial therapy for https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100817
symptomatic urinary tract infection. J Urol 2000;164:1254-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 36. Sarica S, Akkoc Y, Karapolat H, et al Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated
5347(05)67150-9 catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in
13. Breitenbucher RB. Bacterial changes in the urine samples of patients with long-term indwelling catheters. patients with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2010;46:473-9.
Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1585-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1984.00350200077013 37. Cornejo-Davila V, Duran-Ortiz S, Pacheco-Gahbler C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with
14. Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, et al. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients spinal cord injury treated with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Urology 2017;99:260-4.
with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1982;146:719-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.024
infdis/146.6.719 38. Krebs J, Wollner J, Pannek J. Urethral strictures in men with neurogenic lower urinary tract dys-
15. Beier MT. Management of urinary tract infections in the nursing home elderly: A proposed algorith- function using intermittent catheterization for bladder evacuation. Spinal Cord 2015;53:310-3.
mic approach. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999;11:275-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924- https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.15
8579(99)00030-8 39. Lindehall B, Abrahamsson K, Hjalmas K, et al. Complications of clean intermittent catheteriza-
16. Esclarín de Ruz A, García Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract tion in boys and young males with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Urol 2004;172:1686-8.
infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:1285-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/ https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000138847.14680.7d
S0022-5347(05)67157-1 40. Waller L, Jonsson O, Norlen L, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury
17. Shamout S, Biardeau X, Corcos J, et al. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-inter- patients: Long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique. J Urol 1995;153:345-8.
mittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: A systematic review. Spinal Cord 2017; 55:629-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199502000-00014
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.192 41. Newman DK, Willson MM. Review of intermittent catheterization and current best practices. Urol Nurs
18. Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary cath- 2011;31:12-28, 48; quiz 29. https://doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2012.31.1.12
eters: Systematic literature review and meta-analyses. BMC Urol 2017;17:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 42. Kessler TM, Ryu G, Burkhard FC. Clean intermittent self-catheterization: A burden for the patient? Neurourol
s12894-016-0191-1 Urodyn 2009;28:18-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20610
19. DeFoor W, Reddy P, Reed M, et al. Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydro- 43. Shaw C, Logan K, Webber I, et al. Effect of clean intermittent self-catheterization on quality of life: A
philic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder. J Ped Urol 2017;13:373.e371-5. qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2008;61:641-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04556.x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.06.003 44. Wyndaele JJ. Intermittent catheterization: Which is the optimal technique? Spinal Cord 2002;40:432-7.
20. Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu C-D, et al. Randomized crossover trial of single use hydrophilic coated vs. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101312
multiple use polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization to determine incidence of urinary 45. Blumenthal D. Part 1: Quality of care — what is it? N Engl J Med 1996;335:891-4.
infection. J Urol 2015;194:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.096 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199609193351213
21. Mauroy B, Soret R, Bonnal JL, et al. [Comparison of 3 self-lubricated urethral catheters: Prospective study on 46. McConville A. Patients’ experiences of clean intermittent catheterization. Nurs Times 2002;98:55-6.
27 patients]. Ann Urol (Paris) 2001;35:223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4401(01)00033-X 47. Bolinger R, Engberg S. Barriers, complications, adherence, and self-reported quality of life for
22. Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, et al. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter people using clean intermittent catheterization. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2013;40:83-9.
in spinal cord injured patients: A prospective randomized crossover study. J Urol 2001;166:130-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182750117
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66092-2 48. Kreuter M, Siosteen A, Erkholm B, et al. Health and quality of life of persons with spinal cord lesion in
23. Salameh A, Al Mohajer M, Daroucihe RO. Prevention of urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord Australia and Sweden. Spinal Cord 2005;43:123-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101692
injury. CMAJ 2015;187:807-11. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141044 49. Pinder B, Lloyd AJ, Elwick H, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the intermittent self-catheter-
24. Saadat SH, Shepherd S, Van Asseldonk B, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization: Single use vs. reuse. ization questionnaire. Clin Ther 2012;34:2302-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.10.006
Can Urol Assoc J 2019;13:64-9. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5357 50. Fumincelli L, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, et al . Quality of life of patients using intermittent urinary catheteriza-
25. Håkansson MÅ. Reuse vs. single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: What is safe and preferred? tion. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2017;25:e2906. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1816.2906
Review of current status. Spinal Cord 2014;52:511-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.79 51. Chick HE, Hunter KF, Moore KN. Parent and child experiences using a hydrophilic or reused PVC catheter for intermit-
26. Madero-Morales PA, Robles-Torres JI, Vizcarra-Mata G, et al. Randomized clinical trial using sterile single- tent catheterization. J Clin Nurs 2013;22:513-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04066.x
use and reused polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization with a clean technique in spina 52. Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu CD, et al. Randomized crossover trial of single-use hydrophilic coated vs.
bifida: Short-term urinary tract infection outcomes. J Urol 2019:10.1097/JU. https://doi.org/10.1097/ multiple-use polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization to determine incidence of urinary
JU.0000000000000244 infection. J Urol 2015;194:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.096
27. Foley FE. A self-retaining bag catheter: For use as an indwelling catheter for constant drainage of the 53. Avery M, Prieto J, Okamoto I, et al. Reuse of intermittent catheters: A qualitative study of IC users’
bladder. J Urol 1937;38:140-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)71936-2 perspectives. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021554. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021554
28. Siddiq DM, Darouiche RO. New strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Nat Rev 54. Chartier-Kastler E, Amarenco G, Lindbo L, et al. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study
Urol 2012;9:305-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.68 comparing quality of life using compact vs. standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization. J Urol
29. De Ridder DJ, Everaert K, Fernandez LG, et al. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic-coated catheters 2013;190:942-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.026
(SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: A prospec- 55. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Lowe BS, et al. Followup on unsterile intermittent self-catheterization. J Urol
tive, randomized, parallel comparative trial. Eur Urol 2005;48:991-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 1974;111:184-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59922-X
eururo.2005.07.018 56. Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, et al. Intermittent self-catheterization with hydrophilic, gel reser-
30. Vapnek JM, Maynard FM, Kim J. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated cath- voir, and non-coated catheters: A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2013;346:e8639.
eter vs. conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol 2003;169:994-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8639
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000051160.72187.e9 57. Clark JF, Mealing SJ, Scott DA, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term intermittent catheteriza-
31. Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence tion with hydrophilic and uncoated catheters. Spinal Cord 2016;54:73-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/
of urinary tract infections: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1668-71. sc.2015.117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.010 58. Watanabe T, Yamamoto S, Gotoh M, et al. Cost‐effectiveness analysis of long‐term intermittent self‐
32. Spinu A, Onose G, Daia C, et al. Intermittent catheterization in the management of post spinal cord catheterization with hydrophilic‐coated and uncoated catheters in patients with spinal cord injury in Japan.
injury (SCI) neurogenic bladder using new hydrophilic, with lubrication in close circuit devices — our LUTS 2017;9:142-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12122
own preliminary results. J Med Life 2012;5:21-8. 59. Håkansson MÅ, Neovius K, Lundqvist T. Healthcare costs associated with hydrophilic-coated
33. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric and non-coated urinary catheters for intermittent use in the United States. Urol Nurs 2016;36.
catheter. J Urol 1996;156:2041-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65430-2 https://doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2016.36.5.233

E288 CUAJ • July 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 7