Page 9 - Flipbook

BPR: Catheter use

60. Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterization: Cost- 66. Duffy LM, Cleary J, Ahern S, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization: Safe, cost-effective blad-
effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses. BMJ Open 2017;7:e012360. der management for male residents of VA nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:865-70.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012360 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05528.x
61. Truzzi JC, Teich V, Pepe C. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in 67. King RB, Carlson CE, Mervine J, et al. Clean and sterile intermittent catheterization methods in hospitalized
Brazil? A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries. Int Braz J Urol 2018;44:121-31. patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:798-802.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0221 68. Carapeti E, Andrews S, Bentley P. Randomized study of sterile vs. non-sterile urethral catheterization. Ann
62. Health Quality Ontario. Intermittent catheters for chronic urinary retention: A health technology assessment. R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78:59-60.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser [Internet]. Available at: http://www.hqontario.ca/evidence-to-improve- 69. Lemke JR, Kasprowicz K, Worral PS. Intermittent catheterization for patients with a neurogenic bladder:
care/journal-ontario-health-technologyassessment-series Feb;19(1) 2019. Accessed May 8, 2020. Sterile vs. clean using evidence-based practice at the staff nurse level. J Nurs Care Qual 2005;20:302-6.
63. Welk B, Isaranuwatchai W, Krassioukov A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated intermittent cath- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-200510000-00004
eters compared with uncoated catheters in Canada: A public payer perspective. J Med Econ 2018;21:639- 70. Gammack JK. Use and management of chronic urinary catheters in long-term care: Much controversy, little
48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1443112 consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2002;3:162-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1525-8610(04)70459-4
64. Ontario HQ. Intermittent catheters for chronic urinary retention: A health technology assessment. Ontario
Health Technology Assessment Series 2019;19:1. Correspondence: Dr. Lysanne Campeau, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Montreal Jewish
65. Averbeck MA, Krassioukov A, Thiruchelvam N, et al. The impact of different scenarios for intermittent General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; lysanne.campeau@mcgill.ca
bladder catheterization on health state utilities: Results from an internet-based time trade-off survey. J
Med Econ 2018;21:945-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1486846

CUAJ • July 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 7 E289