Page 11 - CUA 2020_Endourology
P. 11

Unmoderated Posters 1: Prostate Cancer, Endourology, BPH





        grade group ≥2. All of these patients had RP due to an upgraded biopsy (1;   UP-1.16. Table 2. Responses of survey respondents
        4%) or clinical judgment, such as rising prostate-specific antigen or con-
        cerning MRI (22; 96%). Prostatectomy pathology revealed grade group ≥2   How beneficial do you feel MDCs are in
        in 15 (65%) patients in the biopsy cohort. In the no-biopsy cohort (n=47),   management of PCa? (n=211)
        39 (82%) had grade group ≥2 on prostatectomy pathology. For patients   No benefit            12 (5.7)
        with PIRADS  ≤3, two (50%) had high-grade cancer in the biopsy group
        compared to five (83%) in the no-biopsy group. For patients with PIRADS   Slight benefit     32 (15.2)
        4, eight (73%) had high-grade cancer in the biopsy group compared to   Moderate benefit      51 (24.2)
        seven (64%) in the no-biopsy group. For patients with PIRADS 5, five   Very beneficial       74 (35.1)
        (63%) had high-grade cancer in the biopsy group compared to 27 (90%)
        in the no-biopsy group.                                 Extremely beneficial                 42 (19.9)
        Conclusions: In this cohort, we found that omitting post-MRI biopsy prior   How beneficial do you feel PCa MDCs are in
        to RP did not result in significant over treatment regardless of MRI find-  promoting research (n=210)
        ings. Validation in other cohorts or in a randomized trial is encouraged.  No benefit         8 (4.8)
                                                                Slight benefit                       21 (10.0)
        UP-1.16                                                 Moderate benefit                     47 (22.4)
        Multidisciplinary clinics in prostate cancer management:
        Knowledge, attitudes, and utilization among urologists  Very beneficial                      95 (45.2)
        Connor Hoge , Matt Kasson , Tianyuan Guan , Rand Naffouje , Timothy   Extremely beneficial   39 (18.6)
                           1
                  1
                                                   2
                                       1
        Struve , Sadhna Verma , Abhinav Sidana 1               MDC patient population (n=107)
                        4
            3
        1 Department of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine,
        Cincinnati, OH, United States;  Department of Hematology and Oncology,   Gleason 6           73 (68.2)
                             2
        University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United   Gleason 7             86 (80.4)
        States;  Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati   Gleason 8–10           89 (83.2)
             3
        College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States;  Department of
                                               4
        Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati,   Active surveillance   61 (57.0)
        OH, United States                                       Advanced/metastatic                  78 (72.9)
        Introduction: Multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) have a growing role in the   Recurrent disease  40 (37.4)
        evaluation and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Such a clinic allows for
                                                               Reasons for not participating in MDC (n=104)
                                                                Lack of benefit                      11 (10.6)
         UP-1.16. Table 1. Characteristics and responses on use of
         MDC survey                                             Insufficient time                    34 (32.7)
         Participate in a MDC? (n=211)                          Cost                                 23 (22.1)
                                                                Lack of infrastructure               68 (65.4)
           Yes                                  107 (51.0)
           No                                   104 (49.3)
                                                             synchronous care, where multiple specialists see the patient at the same
         Age (n=172), mean (±SD)                50.6 (12.1)
                                                             location and day. We aim to evaluate the current knowledge, attitude,
         Gender (n=208)                         41 (47.1)    and practice patterns of urologists regarding PCa MDC, as well as analyze
           Male                                 203 (97.6)   predictors for their utilization.
                                                             Methods: A 14-item questionnaire was designed to collect information on
           Female                                5 (2.4)
                                                             urologists’ preferences and practice patterns regarding MDCs. The survey
         Practice type (n=210)                               was sent to the members of the Society of Urologic Oncology and the
           Academic                             129 (61.4)   Endourological Society. Data was analyzed using R (R Core team, 2017).
                                                             Results: A total of 211 responses were received and summarized in Tables
           Non-academic                         81 (38.6)
                                                             1 and 2. Overall, only 50.1% of respondents use MDCs, of which the
         Years in practice (n=211)                           majority (65.4%) of participants practice in an academic institution.
           0–5                                  31 (14.7)    However, only 53.3% of oncology fellowship-trained urologists reported
                                                             participating in a MDC; 94.3% of all urologists surveyed felt MDCs were
           6–10                                 35 (16.6)
                                                             useful for PCA treatment. A large majority of surgeons feel that MDCs
           11–20                                60 (28.4)    are at least moderately beneficial for PCa treatment (79.0%; p<0.001).
           >20                                  85 (40.3)    Additionally, surgeons participating in MDCs were 2.58x more likely to
                                                             choose “extremely” beneficial than those who do not (odds ratio 2.58;
         Fellowship-trained in urologic oncology (n=210)
                                                             p=0.008). Clinically localized high-risk PCa (Gleason 8–10) constitute
           No                                   105 (50.0)   the most common reason for referral to MDC (83.2%). Of those who do
           Yes                                  105 (50.0)   not use a MDC, the most common reasons cited were lack of infrastruc-
                                                             ture (65.4%) and time (32.7%). Age, practice type, years of practice,
         Number of patients seen monthly with newly          and number of newly diagnosed PCa patients seen per month were not
         diagnosed PCa? (n=211)
                                                             significant predictors for use of MDCs.
           None                                  4 (1.9)     Conclusions: Despite literature indicating the utility of MDCs, as well as
           1–5                                  68 (32.2)    widespread belief in their efficacy, many surgeons deny participating in
                                                             them. Further studies are necessary to pursue potential solutions to major
           6–10                                 68 (32.2)
                                                             barriers of MDC adaptation.
           11–20                                46 (21.8)
           >20                                  25 (11.9)
         Age, practice type, years of practice, and number of newly diagnosed PCa patients seen
         per month were not significant predictors for use of MDCs.
                                                CUAJ • June 2020 • Volume 14, Issue 6(Suppl2)                S49
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16