Page 10 - Guideline
P. 10

09010:Layout 1  3/18/10  9:26 PM  Page E28




         Wood et al.




          Table 7. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I nonseminoma germ cell tumour (selected studies)
          Author                  No.               Risk                             Median
          (publication year)     patients          factors         Regimen        follow-up (mo)      Relapses
          Adjuvant chemotherapy with 2 cycles of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy
          Oliver et al (1992) 76   22         EC, VI, no yolk sac  EBC 3i × 2          43              1 (5%)
                                                  tumour
          Madej et al. (1991) 77   30         VI, LI, RT invasion,  PVB × 3            NR                0
                                               involvement of
                                                 epidydimis
          Pont et al. (1996) 75    29               VI              BEP × 2            79              2 (6.9%)
          Cullen et al. (1996) 74  114        EC, VI, no yolk sac   BEP × 2            48              2 (1.7%)
                                                  tumour
          Studer et al. (2000) 78  59           EC, VI, capsule  PVB or BEP × 2        93              2 (3%)
                                                 penetration
          Chevreau et al.          40              VI, EC           BEP × 2            113               0
          (2004) 79
          Dearnaley et al.        115         EC, VI, no yolk sac   BOP × 2            70              2 (1.7%)
          (2005) 71                               tumour
          Adjuvant chemotherapy with 1 cycle of BEP (experimental)
          Gilbert et al. (2006) 80  22        VI, EC, LI, no Yolk   BEP × 1            122               0
                                                 sac tumour         CEB × 1

          Albers et al. (2008) 65  191              VI              BEP × 1            56              2 (1%)

          Westermann et al.        40             VI, LI, EC        BEP × 1            99              1 (2.5%)
          (2008) 81

          EC = embryonal component; VI = vascular invasion; LI = lymphatic invasion; RT = rete testes; NR = not reported; EBC = etoposide, bleomycin, and carboplatin; PVB = cisplatin [Platinol-AQ],
          vinblastine, bleomycin; BEP = bleomycin, etoposide, platinum; BOP = bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin; CEB = carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin.


            1.  RPLND with consideration of adjuvant chemothera-  Standard chemotherapy for all patients is BEP chemother-
               py if node positive.                             apy. 97-100  The efficacy of the 5-day schedule of BEP with
                                                                                                           2
                                                                                  2
            2.  Surveillance with surgery for stable or growing lesions  etoposide 100 mg/m /day and cisplatin 20 mg/m /day for
               (if becomes marker positive use primary chemother-  5 days and bleomycin 30 IU weekly is of equivalent effi-
               apy approach.                                    cacy to the same drugs given on a 3-day schedule (etopo-
                                                                            2
                                                                                                              2
                                                                side 165 mg/m /day given for 3 days, cisplatin 50 mg/m /day
         5. Treatment of advanced or metastatic disease         given for 2 days, and bleomycin 30 IU weekly. 99  BEP given
                                                                over 3 days, however, has increased short-term gastroin-
         Patients with advanced or metastatic GCTs should always  testinal toxicity and long-term ototoxicity. 99,101  Carboplatin
         be considered potentially curable. Survival outcomes appear  should not be substituted for cisplatin due to inferior out-
         to be better in specialized centres and this may be related  comes. 102,103  Thus, the original 5-day BEP regimen, there-
         to experience, case selection, volume, and/or the organi-  fore, is the preferred option for the management of advanced
         zation of multidisciplinary care. 4,11,96  Referral of all patients  GCTs. Modifications in BEP to reduce toxicity or improve
         with advanced GCTs for consultation to a specialized cen-  convenience should be avoided as they may also reduce
         tre is strongly recommended. Patients with advanced dis-  efficacy. A summary of the randomized trials in advanced
         ease can be stratified into three prognostic groups using  disease is shown in Table 8.
                                  10
         the IGCCC criteria (Table 2b). Prognostic variables include  In patients with IGCCC “good” prognosis disease, 3 cycles
         histology (nonseminoma vs. seminoma), site of the primary  of BEP should be given. 97,98,104,105  If there is a contraindi-
         testicular (retroperitoneal and other), presence or absence  cation to bleomycin, 4 cycles of EP can be given, but has
         of non-pulmonary visceral metastases (brain, bone or liver)  been associated with a nonstatistically significant but high-
         and degree of marker elevation (AFP, β-HCG and LDH).   er death rate in one RCT. 100,106,107


         E28                                         CUAJ • April 2010 • Volume 4, Issue 2
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15