Page 9 - Guideline
P. 9

09010:Layout 1  3/18/10  9:26 PM  Page E27




                                                                              Management of testicular germ cell cancer




          Table 6. Adjuvant RPLND in the management of stage I nonseminoma

                                                                                            Adjuvant    No. patients
          Author (publication year)  Years of  Patients  PS I (%)  PS II (%)  Relapse  Relapse  chemotherapy,  dead of testis
          Site                     study     CS I                     PS I, %   PS II, %
                                                                                               %        cancer (%)
          Donohue (1993) 66      1979-1989   378     266 (70)   112    12%       34%          13%        3 (0.8%)
          Indiana                                               (30)
          Sweeney (2000) 67      1990-1995   292     226 (77)  66 (22)  10%      22%          12%        1 (0.3%)
          Indiana
          Nicolai (2004) 68
                                 1985-1995   322     262 (80)  60 (20)  NR       27%          NR         4 (1.2%)
          Milan
          Stephenson (2005) 69   1989-2002   297     214 (72)  83 (28)  6%       19%          15%        1 (0.3%)
          MSKCC, NYC
          Spermon (2002) 193
                                 1982-1994   101     70 (69)   31 (31)  10%       0%          31%        1 (1.0%)
          Nijmegen
          Weissbach (1990) 64    1982-1987  (CS I     229       NR     17%        NR          NR            2
          TTSG Bonn                          NR)
          Klepp* (1997) 48
                                 1990-1994   99      85 (86)   14 (14)  18%       0%          14%         0 (0%)
          SWENOTECA
          Albers** (2008) 65
          German Testicular Cancer  1996-2005  173   141 (82)  32 (18)  9%        0%          18%         0 (0%)
          Study Group
          CS = clinical stage; PS = pathological stage; NR = not reported; MSKCC, NYC = Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; TTSG = Testicular Tumour Study Group;
          * = indicates single arm of a risk-adapted study; ** = indicates single arm of a randomized trial; SWENOTECA = Swedish-Norwegian Testicular Cancer Project.


         can be spared a residual tumour resection and the associat-  without corresponding increase of the tumour markers, RPLND
         ed morbidities, such as loss of ejaculation. In addition, relapse  should be performed by an experienced surgeon because of
         rates after primary chemotherapy are low with 4% to 9% for  suspected teratoma. Patients with a rapidly growing lesion
         clinical stage IIA and 11% to 15% for clinical stage IIB dis-  and/or a concomitant increase of the tumour, markers should
         ease. 86,87  Patients with elevated serum tumour AFP, HCG or  not be resected but treated with primary BEP chemotherapy
         LDH  and/or  CS  IIB  are  therefore  treated  with  primary  according to the treatment algorithm for patients with metasta-
         chemotherapy according to the algorithms for patients with  tic disease and IGCCCG recommendations. 90-92
         advanced disease, according to International Germ Cell Cancer  When RPLND is performed this should be done using a
         Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) recommendations. 10,69,88  full template nerve-sparing technique. 69
            Patients without marker elevations but with retroperi-  Further options after RPLND are surveillance or adju-
         toneal lymph nodes 1 to 2 cm, suspected to be CS IIA, rep-  vant chemotherapy. For patients with PS IIA and B, the risk
         resent a particular problem. Differential diagnosis in these  of recurrence is 30% and 50%, respectively, with surveil-
         patients includes benign lymph node enlargement but also  lance only. 82,85,87,93-95  Relapses occur almost exclusively
         teratoma or active germ cell cancer. None of the currently  outside the retroperitoneum. Adjuvant chemotherapy with
         used imaging methods including positron emission tomog-  2 cycles of BEP in all PS IIA/B patients after RPLND reduces
         raphy (PET) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)  this risk of recurrence to about 0 to 7%. 82,87  Yet, adjuvant
         can reliably identify patients with metastases. Three options  chemotherapy represents an overtreatment in 50% to 70%
         can be considered for these patients: RPLND, surveillance  of radically operated PS IIA/B patients with the resulting
         or primary chemotherapy. With RPLND, the pathological  treatment-related toxicity and possible late sequelae.
         stage can be verified immediately, although 10% to 40%
         of patients will have non-malignant histology and PS I dis-  Consensus recommendations
         ease. 69,87,89  If surveillance is chosen, follow-up imaging after
         6 weeks is indicated to document whether the lesion grows,  Patients with CS IIA marker positive disease and IIB regard-
         remains stable or shrinks. A shrinking lesion is likely to be  less  of  marker  state  should  be  managed  with  primary
         not of malignant origin and should be further observed. A  chemotherapy.
         stable or growing lesion indicates either teratoma or undif-  Patients with IIA disease without marker elevation can
         ferentiated malignant tumour. If the lesion grows slowly and  be managed by:


                                                     CUAJ • April 2010 • Volume 4, Issue 2                      E27
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14