Page 9 - Guideline
P. 9

Campeau et al.



       par Astellas et Pfizer. Le D Carlson a été membre de conseils consultatifs pour le compte d’Astellas   18.  Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary cath-
                    r
       et Pfizer; il a reçu des honoraires de voyage de la part d’Allergan et a participé à des essais cliniques   eters: Systematic literature review and meta-analyses. BMC Urol 2017;17:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/
       appuyés par Astellas et Pfizer. Le D Elterman a été membre de conseils consultatifs et de bureaux de   s12894-016-0191-1
                         r
       conférenciers pour le compte d’Allergan, Astellas, Boston Scientific, Duchesnay, Ferring, Medtronic et   19.  DeFoor W, Reddy P, Reed M et al. Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydro-
       Pfizer; il a reçu des subventions et/ou des honoraires de Boston Scientific et Pfizer et il a participé   philic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder. J Ped Urol 2017;13:373.e371-5.
       à des essais cliniques appuyés par Astellas, Boston Scientific et Medtronic. Le D Hickling a été   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.06.003
                                                  r
       membre de conseils consultatifs pour le compte de Pfizer, membre des bureaux des conférenciers   20.  Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu C-D et al. Randomized crossover trial of single use hydrophilic coated vs.
                                                                multiple use polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization to determine incidence of urinary
       d’Allergan, Astellas et Pfizer; il a reçu des subventions et/ou des honoraires d’Allergan, Astellas et   infection. J Urol 2015;194:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.096
       Pfizer et il a participé à des essais cliniques appuyés par Astellas. Les autres auteurs ne font état   21.  Mauroy B, Soret R, Bonnal JL et al. Comparaison de trois sondes urétrales droites autolubrifiées : étude prospective
       d’aucun conflit d’intérêts personnel ou financier en lien avec le présent rapport.  chez 27 patients. Ann Urol (Paris) 2001;35:223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4401(01)00033-X
                                                             22.  Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G et al. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter
                                                                in spinal cord injured patients: A prospective randomized crossover study. J Urol 2001;166:130-3.
       Avant d’être publié, ce guide de pratique a été passé en revue par le Comité des guides de pratique   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66092-2
       de l’AUC, les membres à titre particulier de l’AUC, le Comité de rédaction du JAUC et le Conseil   23.  Salameh A, Al Mohajer M, Daroucihe RO. Prevention of urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord
                                                                injury. CMAJ 2015;187:807-11. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141044
       d’administration de l’AUC.                            24.  Saadat SH, Shepherd S, Van Asseldonk B et al. Clean intermittent catheterization: Single use vs. reuse.
                                                                Can Urol Assoc J 2019;13:64-9. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5357
                                                             25.  Håkansson MÅ. Reuse vs. single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: What is safe and preferred?
                                                                Review of current status. Spinal Cord 2014;52:511-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.79
       Références                                            26.  Madero-Morales PA, Robles-Torres JI, Vizcarra-Mata G et al. Randomized clinical trial using sterile single-use
                                                                and reused polyvinylchloride catheters for intermittent catheterization with a clean technique in spina
        1.  Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured   bifida: Short-term urinary tract infection outcomes. J Urol 2019:10.1097/JU. https://doi.org/10.1097/
          patients. J Urol 2000;163:768-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67800-7  JU.0000000000000244
        2.  Nicolle LE, Committee SL-TC. Urinary tract infections in long-term-care facilities. Infect Control Hosp   27.  Foley FE. A self-retaining bag catheter: For use as an indwelling catheter for constant drainage of the
          Epidemiol 2001;22:167-75. https://doi.org/10.1086/501886  bladder. J Urol 1937;38:140-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)71936-2
        3.  Peatfield R, Burt A, Smith P. Suprapubic catheterization after spinal cord injury: A followup report. Paraplegia   28.  Siddiq DM, Darouiche RO. New strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Nat Rev
          1983;21:220-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1983.35     Urol 2012;9:305-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.68
        4.  Feifer A, Corcos J. Contemporary role of suprapubic cystostomy in treatment of neuropathic bladder   29.  De Ridder DJ, Everaert K, Fernandez LG et al. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic-coated catheters
          dysfunction in spinal cord injured patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:475-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/  (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: A prospective, random-
          nau.20569                                             ized, parallel comparative trial. Eur Urol 2005;48:991-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.018
        5.  Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:609-22.   30.  Vapnek JM, Maynard FM, Kim J. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter
          https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70376-7         vs. conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol 2003;169:994-8. https://
        6.  Saint S, Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Should we? Can we? How? Arch Int Med   doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000051160.72187.e9
          1999;159:800-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.8.800  31.  Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence
        7.  Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ et al. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary   of urinary tract infections: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1668-71.
          tract disease. J Urol 2002;167:1131-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(02)80359-7  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.010
        8.  Cornejo-Dávila V, Durán-Ortiz S, Pacheco-Gahbler C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with   32.  Spinu A, Onose G, Daia C et al. Intermittent catheterization in the management of post spinal cord injury
          spinal cord injury treated with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Urology 2017;99:260-4.   (SCI) neurogenic bladder using new hydrophilic, with lubrication in close circuit devices — our own
          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.024         preliminary results. J Med Life 2012;5:21-8.
        9.  Afsar S, Yemisci O, Cosar S et al. Compliance with clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury   33.  Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS et al. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric
          patients: A long-term followup study. Spinal Cord 2013;51:645. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.46  catheter. J Urol 1996;156:2041-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65430-2
       10.  Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated   34.  Stensballe J, Looms D, Nielsen PN et al. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization
          urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases   reduce urethral micro trauma: A prospective, randomized, participant-blinded, crossover study of three dif-
          Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:625-63. https://doi.org/10.1086/650482  ferent types of catheters. Eur Urol 2005;48:978-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.009
       11.  Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML et al. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral   35.  Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen K, Hansen HV. Urethral epithelial cells on the surface on hydrophilic catheters
          catheterization. N Engl J Med 1974;291:215-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197408012910501  after intermittent catheterization: Crossover study with two catheters. Spinal Cord 1999;37:299-300.
       12.  Raz R, Schiller D, Nicolle LE. Chronic indwelling catheter replacement before antimicrobial therapy for   https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100817
          symptomatic urinary tract infection. J Urol 2000;164:1254-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-  36.  Sarica S, Akkoc Y, Karapolat H et al. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated
          5347(05)67150-9                                       catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in
       13.  Breitenbucher RB. Bacterial changes in the urine samples of patients with long-term indwelling catheters.   patients with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2010;46:473-9.
          Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1585-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1984.00350200077013  37.  Cornejo-Davila V, Duran-Ortiz S, Pacheco-Gahbler C. Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with
       14.  Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM et al. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic   spinal cord injury treated with clean intermittent self-catheterization. Urology 2017;99:260-4.
          indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1982;146:719-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/146.6.719  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.024
       15.  Beier MT. Management of urinary tract infections in the nursing home elderly: A proposed algorith-  38.  Krebs J, Wollner J, Pannek J. Urethral strictures in men with neurogenic lower urinary tract dys-
          mic approach. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999;11:275-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-  function using intermittent catheterization for bladder evacuation. Spinal Cord 2015;53:310-3.
          8579(99)00030-8                                       https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.15
       16.  Esclarín de Ruz A, García Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract   39.  Lindehall B, Abrahamsson K, Hjalmas K et al. Complications of clean intermittent catheteriza-
          infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:1285-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/  tion in boys and young males with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Urol 2004;172:1686-8.
          S0022-5347(05)67157-1                                 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000138847.14680.7d
       17.  Shamout S, Biardeau X, Corcos J et al. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-inter-  40.  Waller L, Jonsson O, Norlen L et al. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury
          mittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: A systematic review. Spinal Cord 2017; 55:629-43.   patients: Long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique. J Urol 1995;153:345-8.
          https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.192                   https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199502000-00014



       R18                                       CUAJ • Juillet 2020 • Volume 14, numéro 7
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10